How the Westboro Baptist Church Can Help You Lose Weight

Do you want to learn to play the guitar? Speak Spanish? Lose weight? Then set aside $100 of your pretax income to donate to the Westboro Baptist Church.

Do you want to learn to play the guitar? Speak Spanish? Lose weight? Then set aside $100 of your pretax income to donate to the Westboro Baptist Church. Come again?


The Westboro Baptist Church, based in Kansas, does a better job than perhaps any other hate group in uniting Americans against it. The 40-member group pickets military funerals, stomps on American flags and targets Jews, gay people and the families of murder victims to get media attention. If you're not offended by this group in some way, you're just not paying close enough attention. 

What's the Big Idea?

If you want to learn a valuable life skill or improve your health you should consider earmarking a portion of your hard-earned money to donate to a group that really makes your blood boil. It doesn't have to be Westboro. You support gun control? Pick the NRA as your anti-charity. You're pro-life? Planned Parenthood. 

As meta-learning guru Tim Ferriss tells Big Think, "you would rather slam your head in a car door than give money to this group." So go ahead and set aside that $100. Then find a really hard-nosed friend, someone to play referee and hold you accountable. Then if you light up that cigarette or eat that chocolate, your friend will make sure you mail your donation to the Tea Party or the ACLU. It's your choice. 

"The point here is that people will work much harder not to lose something than they will to gain something," Ferriss says. In other words, when you set a goal for yourself, there needs to be something meaningful at stake. Ferriss, the author of The 4-Hour Workweek and the recent meta-learning book The 4-Hour Chef, told us in a recent interview that this concept should not be regarded as a depressing fact about human nature, but as a highly useful insight. Ferriss says if you create consequences for your actions you can accomplish "miraculous feats."

What's the Significance?

Ferriss describes a meta-learning blueprint that can be applied to the acquisition of any skill, whether it's hitting a baseball or memorizing a series of facts. This "grand recipe," as Ferriss calls it, involves deconstruction, selection, sequencing and stakes

Deconstruction involves taking an amorphous and intimidating skill like learning to speak a language and "breaking it down into more manageable pieces that you can look at under a microscope. 

Selection involves picking the activity that will basically result in the highest return on your investment. In the case of learning a language, "selecting 2.5 percent of the total vocabulary will make you functionally fluent," Ferriss says. So you will need to set out to master those high frequency words. 

Sequencing is what Ferriss calls the "secret sauce" in his recipe. Ferriss doesn't play golf but says he enjoys speaking to the best teachers in the world and that is why he sought out Stan Utley, a short game coach who focuses on putting. Many people come to Utley and ask him to look at their form. Utley will respond, "Your form is fine. Your sequence is off. The parts of your body that should be moving in one order are moving in another." In all of his books, Ferriss presents methods for distilling what the right sequence is. 

Stakes is creating a carrot or a stick so that you do what you actually need to do. The idea of picking an anti-charity is derived from the site Stickk.com, an online commitment store. There are other sites that can serve as tools as well, such as Dietbet.com, but Ferriss says you really don't need any technology at all. He gives one example:

Tracy, a woman I know, mother of two, 40-something -- she lost I think a total of 130 pounds by creating a betting pool with her co-workers.  A hundred dollars a piece, whoever can lose the most weight in the next -- I think it was six months or a year -- gets the pot.  

Now what I want to point out there, though, it’s not just the reward, it’s the fact that they each had one hundred dollars to lose that’s really important. People will work much harder not to lose something than they will to gain something.  

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

In 1999, David Bowie knew the internet would change the world

Musican. Actor. Fashion Icon. Internet Visionary?

Technology & Innovation
  • David Bowie was well known as a rock star, but somehow his other interests and accomplishments remain obscure.
  • In this 1999 interview, he explains why he knows the internet is more than just a tool and why it was destined to change the world.
  • He launched his own internet service provider in 1998, BowieNet. It ceased operations in 2006.
Keep reading Show less

People who constantly complain are harmful to your health

Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.

Photo credit: Getty Images / Stringer
popular

Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.

Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.

Keep reading Show less

​Is science synonymous with 'truth'? Game theory says, 'not always.'

Good science is sometimes trumped by the craving for a "big splash."

Videos
  • Scientists strive to earn credit from their peers, for grants from federal agencies, and so a lot of the decisions that they make are strategic in nature. They're encouraged to publish exciting new findings that demonstrate some new phenomenon that we have never seen before.
  • This professional pressure can affect their decision-making — to get acclaim they may actually make science worse. That is, a scientist might commit fraud if he thinks he can get away with it or a scientist might rush a result out of the door even though it hasn't been completely verified in order to beat the competition.
  • On top of the acclaim of their peers, scientists — with the increasing popularity of science journalism — are starting to be rewarded for doing things that the public is interested in. The good side of this is that the research is more likely to have a public impact, rather than be esoteric. The bad side? To make a "big splash" a scientist may push a study or article that doesn't exemplify good science.