Brad Templeton: Privacy and Security Are Not Mutually Exclusive

Isn't the internet great? It's this remarkable and multifaceted one-stop shop for socializing, romance, commerce, and cat videos. But thanks to the revelations of Edward Snowden and other whistleblowers, we've realized that the internet is also something else -- something a lot less exciting.

Brad Templeton, the Track Chair for Computing at Singularity University, explains:

"What has the government done and what has big business done? They've turned [the internet] into the world's greatest surveillance apparatus, a surveillance apparatus that even George Orwell probably wouldn't have dreamed of."

Templeton is very passionate about the invasive nature of widespread internet surveillance because it exists as an affront to the idea of a free society. A free society, in searching for a needle in a haystack, does not opt to tear apart the entire haystack.

"Nobody thinks that we shouldn't have police and intelligence agents whose job it is to find bad guys and stop bad guys. That's not a question. But a free society makes a decision for itself. It makes a decision to limit the power of its police and its intelligence agents. It makes the decision to let some bad things happen, to let some guilty people get away in order to avoid punishing innocent people, [to avoid] doing surveillance on people who are innocent and there's no reason to suspect them.  But unfortunately that's not what happens."

So how do we, as citizens of a free society, fight against it? Templeton believes the key is in drawing the line between security and privacy. We need to establish that they're not mutually exclusive, that you don't need to search the entire haystack to feel safe:

"We need to make people think there's not necessarily some trade-off between privacy and security, that it's possible sometimes to keep your rights and gain security at the same time, it's just harder.  The easy thing to do is just make everyone give up their rights."

A related challenge to personal liberties exists in the form of invasive and futile anti-privacy measures:

We have a lot of forces pushing for laws and technology to basically lock down your computer so not so that you can trust it but so that movie studios and governments and so on can trust that you can't do things on it.  And that is something that computer engineers all know is never going to work and is just going to make things broken.

For more on internet surveillance, as well as a discussion about how to protect free speech on the web, be sure to watch this clip from Brad Templeton's Big Think interview:

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Should you invest in China's stock market? Know this one thing first.

Despite incredible economic growth, it is not necessarily an investor's paradise.

  • China's stock market is just 27 years old. It's economy has grown 30x over that time.
  • Imagine if you had invested early and gotten in on the ground floor.
  • Actually, you would have lost money. Here's how that's possible.
Keep reading Show less

People who constantly complain are harmful to your health

Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.

Photo credit: Getty Images / Stringer

Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.

Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.

Keep reading Show less
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less