How Nouriel Roubini Foresaw the Financial Crisis

The NYU Economist who famously saw the global financial crisis before it happened shares his methods on how he did it, and what he sees next. 

New York University economics professor Nouriel Roubini famously predicted the most recent global financial crisis well before most of his peers did. He says he did this simply by looking at the data and considering it in the context of past bubbles. Roubini recently spoke with Big Think about how to see what’s really happening—even when most people don't agree with you. 


Roubini says he started predicting the bust around June of 2006 after looking impartially at the information at hand: "When you were looking at the US data you were seeing that the quantities both in terms of housing starts and demand were starting to fall.”  This was the trigger he knew to look for ahead of time that would signal the start of the downturn. 
 
The economic bubble (and burst) can be a lesson in avoiding group think, explains Roubini.  “The issue is not why myself or a few others got them, but why most the people, not just economists, don’t see them coming,” he says of the data of a looming economic collapse that should have set off more alarms.  The key problem, he says, is when there is a an economic bubble, “everybody lives in a bubble ... They don’t live in reality and they delude themselves.”
 
To see a bubble from the inside, Roubini adds, it’s important not to get blinded by your own incentive. "It’s very hard to be independent and speak the truth, even if you can be very smart," he says, if your pay is tied to the results you are expected to produce.  Independence from the results provides a clearer picture, he notes. 
 
Roubini also spoke with Big Think about the future of China, and why its growth might mean the country will face its own financial crisis.  “There are asset bubbles in commercial, residential real estate and there is a risk that if these things are not controlled eventually … those imbalances can lead also to a financial crisis in China,” he says. “It’s not your typical kind of Anglo-Saxon kind of style of financial crisis,” he says, noting that the pressures and potential bubbles in China will take on a different form because of the state of the Chinese currency.

Plants have awareness and intelligence, argue scientists

Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.

Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
  • Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
  • Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Keep reading Show less

Vaping changes blood vessels after one use, even without nicotine

E-cigarettes may be safer than traditional cigarettes, but they come with their own risks.


John Keeble
/GETTY
Surprising Science
  • A new study used an MRI machine to examine how vaping e-cigarettes affects users' cardiovascular systems immediately after inhalation.
  • The results showed that vaping causes impaired circulation, stiffer arteries and less oxygen in their blood.
  • The new study adds to a growing body of research showing that e-cigarettes – while likely safer than traditional cigarettes – are far from harmless.
Keep reading Show less

Space is dead: A challenge to the standard model of quantum mechanics

Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.

Videos
  • Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
  • In nature, properties of Particle B may be depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
  • In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.
Keep reading Show less