The Personal Side of Disruptive Innovation

Last week, Big Think uploaded a new interview with Clayton Christensen, the Harvard Business School "disruptive innovation" evangelizer. Now Adam Singer on the Future Buzz website, lists a few ways an employee can disrupt inside his or her own company every day. The post is entitled "Be A Disrupter" and here it is in its entirety:

Are you in a corporation and see someone above you making mistakes?  Put together a case and call them out, don’t ever let someone’s title stop you from that.

Find a better way to do something that’s more efficient than the way it has always been done?  Don’t even ask permission, just put your new path into action.

Do you notice a vendor or agency you’re working with may not be the best choice?  Don’t suffer in silence, find a better partner and cut those who are dragging you down.

See people trying to spin numbers in a meeting or use excessive buzzwords but say nothing of substance?  Make notes and show how they’re wrong later to the right people.

In all of these cases, if you’re sure you’re correct - go for it.  There’s no reason to be afraid here, and it’s what being a leader is all about.

Be a disrupter, and if you know something is wrong or could be better, put yourself and your own reputation on the line and say it.  There’s no power in being silent, and no reason to maintain a situation that is bringing down the level of your work or the products of your company - whether they’re tangible or otherwise.

If you know something is wrong - by not stepping in and saying what is right, you’re doing as much harm as those who are blind to the situation or too busy to notice.  By disrupting the norm to create change for the better, you’ll be seen as a strong source of signal and light in an environment otherwise paralyzed with fear.

And that’s just what smart businesses, marketers and bloggers do every day without hesitation.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.