Should you be for-profit or nonprofit? Why not both?

Cutting edge social innovators should consider hybrid models

Close up of handful of one hundred dollar notes

Over the past fifteen years, I've had the opportunity to provide strategy for well over a hundred social change start-ups seeking to make the world a better place. The most common question they ask, "Should we be a for-profit or a nonprofit."

My answer, "Why not consider both?" Let's review the advantages and disadvantages.


The nonprofit option

Human hands holding polygonal heartHuman hands holding polygonal heart. Love, peace and donation concept. Charity event. Vector illustration for non-profit organisation

The nonprofit option is the most popular choice with over $410 billion given to 1.5 million nonprofits last year alone. Nonprofit leaders report back to me four primary advantages to this legal structure:

  1. "My donors get a tax deduction."
  2. "Foundations prefer giving to nonprofit entities."
  3. "Nonprofits have a good brand in our culture."
  4. "We don't have to pay taxes!"

They also cite three major disadvantages:

  1. "I feel like I'm in constant fundraising mode—I'm chasing donors not solving problems."
  2. "Instead of seeing our impact, donors scrutinize my salary and overhead costs."
  3. "No matter how much sweat equity I put into my work, I have no financial gain to show for it."

Impact investing for for-profit social ventures

The rise of impact investing into for-profit social ventures makes this is a powerful alternative to the nonprofit model. The Global Impact Investing Network reported that "225 investors, including pension funds, invested $35.5 billion across 11,136 impact investment deals in 2017. That is up 58% from $22.1 billion across 7,951 deals in 2016." That $35 billion is getting pretty close to the $66.90 billion donated by charitable foundations in 2017.

Nonprofit leaders are also looking toward for profit earned income as part of their future as well. A recent Bridgespan Group survey of US nonprofits' executives reported they "believe earned income would play an important role in bolstering their organizations' revenue in the future." According to Echoing Green, a nonprofit with a 25-year record of supporting early-stage social entrepreneurs, the proportion of their applicant pool proposing for-profit and hybrid organizations has grown to nearly 50 percent, compared to 15 percent in 2006.

For-profit social ventures name three primary advantages to choosing this model.

  1. "I no longer feel like I'm begging donors year in and year out."
  2. "There's untapped capital out there without sufficient social ventures to invest in."
  3. "We put in our own sweat equity and as owners, I might get a great long term financial return for my work."

Social ventures also described to me three disadvantages.

  1. "I don't know how to find impact investors."
  2. "We aren't able to get funding from foundations or other traditional donors."
  3. "It's hard to measure and report out both impact measurement and return on investment to investors."

Hybrid models that include both for-profit and nonprofit entities can maximize the advantages of each model, while minimizing the disadvantages. These hybrids come in many shapes and sizes.

A Case Study: Town Stages

A Town Stages production space

townstages.com

A good examples of a hybrid model was reported in Forbes magazine by Carey Purcell. In the article titled, "How a 'Robin Hood' Business Model Supports an Artistic Clubhouse in Tribeca," she tells the story of Town Stages LLC a "female-driven cultural institution and event venue owned by a nonprofit Sokoloff Arts." The founder Robin Sokoloff wanted to provide spaces to work and live for artists like herself to survive ever-rising NYC rent. Town Stages, with space rentals for weddings, bar mitzvahs, and business events, subsidizes Sokoloff Art fellows.

Artists can rent the space at the rate they can afford, and the revenue is used to subsidize other emerging artists. Not only does she provide spaces for artists, but her organization is also focused on the advancement of young women, minorities, and LGBTQ voices. Town Stages has become a home for underrepresented voices in the community and was able to expand its impact thanks to the success of her first artistic hub. Since 2012, they allowed 70,000 people to create almost 900 different works of art.

Social Venture hybrids have some profound advantages, especially when it comes to fundraising and equity. In particular, they allow the social venture to say "yes" to both impact investors and traditional foundations. They allow social entrepreneur teams to be owners and get a financial reward for the unpaid time they invest in the cause.

"Guard Rails" required

Hybrids also have the disadvantage of requiring more well thought out accounting "guard rails" to make sure the organization operates legally — nonprofit money must always serves the public interest, not someone's private interest. Arron M. Fox CPA at the Senior Tax Manager, at Raffa, Marcum's Nonprofit and Social Sector Group describes one way to create a hybrid model called a for-profit subsidiary in his piece "Considerations When Creating a For-Profit Subsidiary."

Rich Tafel is the Director of Raffa Social Capital Advisors - Marcum's Nonprofit and Social Sector Group
Marcum LLP. Rich.Tafel@MarcumLLP.com

More From Richard Tafel
Related Articles

Do same-sex couples resolve conflicts in a healthier way?

A 12-year long study examines the differences between how same-sex and different-sex couples argue, with some surprising results.

Photo by Irma eyewink on Shutterstock
Sex & Relationships
  • A 12-year long study by the Gottman Institute examines the differences between how same-sex couples and different-sex couples resolve conflicts.
  • Overall, the relationship satisfaction and quality were about the same across all couple types (gay, straight, lesbian). However, the study did find some differences in how same-sex and different-sex couples argue, including using humor to diffuse tense situations, not taking things so personally during an argument and offering encouragement rather than criticism.
  • No matter the relationship, there are key points to be taken away from this research in how we can all strive for healthier conflict resolutions in romantic relationships.
Keep reading Show less

Expert tips for avoiding the 'time famine' trap

How to manage your time so you can actually accomplish what you want to

Pexels
Personal Growth
  • In a world that's always online, it's easy to feel like we have insufficient time for ourselves, or to spend with our families and loved ones.
  • Working out what you need to get done each day, and how long it will take, will allow you to create priorities on which you can focus your available time.
  • If you find the traditional methods of mindfulness meditation too difficult, then meditative practices such as yoga or even running can also be extremely beneficial.
Keep reading Show less

The history of using the Insurrection Act against Americans

Numerous U.S. Presidents invoked the Insurrection Act to to quell race and labor riots.

Photo by Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • U.S. Presidents have invoked the Insurrection Act on numerous occasions.
  • The controversial law gives the President some power to bring in troops to police the American people.
  • The Act has been used mainly to restore order following race and labor riots.
Keep reading Show less