One way to increase voter turnout? More sleep.
A new study posits that sleep deprivation decreases civic participation.
- Forty percent of Americans sleep less than seven hours, resulting in lost productivity, more accidents, and an increased likelihood of dementia.
- A new study shows that a lack of sleep also results in decreased voter turnout.
- Other prosocial behaviors are also implicated in this discussion, including signing petitions and donating money to charity.
As Democratic candidates discuss ways to increase voter turnout in 2020, a missing piece of the puzzle has been addressed in Nature Human Behaviour. You likely won't hear Elizabeth Warren or Pete Buttigieg discuss the importance of sleep for ensuring more bodies at ballot boxes, but that's what a new study from researchers in the U.S. and Germany discovered.
Sleep has become an important line of research in recent years. Forty percent of Americans sleep less than seven hours per night, resulting in lost productivity, more accidents, and an increased likelihood of dementia. Insomnia is a growing concern for millions.
Yet the opposite is also true. For example, napping increases productivity and engagement at work. Short bouts of sleep help sharpen our senses, strengthen our immune system, reduce the likelihood of cardiovascular disease, help us solve complex problems, and increase mood and cognitive performance. Regular nights of good sleep accomplish many similar goals.
For this study, the team of John Holbein (Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT), Jerome Schafer (Department of Political Science, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich), and David Dickinson (Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC) wanted to know if sleep reduces civic engagement. Using three methods of testing, they found the answer to be affirmative.
Don't Sleep On Your Local Elections | Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj | Netflix
Over the last six decades, they write, increasing number of citizens in industrialized societies receive inadequate sleep—the number has increased fourfold during that time. They estimate between 50-70 million Americans are chronically sleep deprived. Individual negative health outcomes are well-studied. How that affects society, less so.
By conducting three complementary studies, the team found that less sleep equals less participation in the voting booth. Regardless of intention, when citizens were not well-rested, they were less likely to follow through on them. They write,
"Individuals who sleep less and who are chronically fatigued may struggle to engage, even if they want to do so. Such individuals may lack the motivation, capacity and social connections to overcome the hurdles, distractions or costs that get in the way of participating in social processes that benefit society."
It's not only voting. Other prosocial behaviors are also implicated in this discussion, including signing petitions and donating money to charity. Many of these citizens state they'd like to civically engage. Anecdote is not data, but when one is cranky or undernourished from lack of sleep, their motivation suffers. The nation suffers as well.
Hundreds of campaigners in Hamburg's Barclaycard Arena count out the ballots of the district assembly elections.
Photo by Axel Heimken/picture alliance via Getty Images
There are many reasons citizens don't vote. In 2016, 58 percent of eligible voters cast their ballot in America, an eight-point drop from 2008. Midterm voters in 2018 hit a 50-year high—plenty of sleep!—yet we cannot become complacent in 2020. We need to get enough sleep.
As John Holbein says about the consequences of sleep deprivation,
"This shows that many people want to participate but are just too tired to do so. Sleep deprivation has real consequences for the social health of our communities. Not only does it make it harder for people to get their jobs done or to do well in school it also makes them less likely to contribute in ways that build democracies."
Holbein notes that when we don't get enough sleep, we become more selfish. We focus on ourselves more and society less. While physiologically understandable, this does not help build a great nation.
Maybe the next stump speech by Democratic candidates should include the benefits of sleep. In fact, a recent NY Times special posed the question to 21 of them: "How many hours of sleep do you get a night?" The main response: "Not enough." The only two to reply "eight" were Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand. Eric Swalwell might laugh when he replies "four," but sadly, that answer isn't good for his health (or that of America).
Asking voters about their sleep habits might take some of them by surprise, but the science is sound. If we ask it of ourselves, we should be asking it of our leaders as well. When it comes to democratic participation, everyone's effort is required.
Researchers have just discovered the remains of a hybrid human.
90,000 years ago, a young girl lived in a cave in the Altai mountains in southern Siberia. Her life was short; she died in her early teens, but she stands at a unique point in human evolution. She is the first known hybrid of two different kinds of ancient humans: the Neanderthals and the Denisovans.
These thought leaders, founders, and entrepreneurs are propelling the kind of future we want to be a part of.
- The tech industry may be dominated by men in terms of numbers, but there are lots of brilliant women in leadership positions that are changing the landscape.
- The women on this list are founders of companies dedicated to teaching girls to code, innovators in the fields of AI, VR, and machine learning, leading tech writers and podcasters, and CEOs of companies like YouTube and Project Include.
- This list is by no means all-encompassing. There are many more influential women in tech that you should seek out and follow.
Most said they want to act on their desire someday. But do open relationships actually work?
- The study involved 822 Americans who were in monogamous relationships at the time.
- Participants answered questions about their personalities, sexual fantasies, and intentions to act on those fantasies.
- Research suggests practicing consent, comfort, and communication makes open relationships more likely to succeed.
Consensual non-monogamy fantasies<p>For the new study, published in <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-020-01788-7" target="_blank">Archives of Sexual Behavior</a>, researchers asked 822 people in monogamous relationships to:</p><ul><li>Describe their favorite sexual fantasy, defined as "mental images you have while you are awake that you find to be sexually arousing or erotic."</li><li>Select which themes apply to that fantasy, such as having sex with multiple people at the same time, experimenting with taboos, or engaging in a sexually open relationship.</li><li>Answer whether they intended to carry out these fantasies, and discuss them with their partner.</li><li>Complete assessments on relationship satisfaction, erotophilia and personality, as measured by the Big Five Personality inventory.</li></ul><p>The results showed that 32.6 percent of participants said being part of a sexually open relationship was "part of their favorite sexual fantasy of all time." More surprising is that, of that one-third, 80 percent said they want to act on this fantasy in the future.</p>
Pretzelpaws via Wikipedia Commons<p style="margin-left: 20px;">"The present research confirms the important distinction between sexual fantasy and sexual desire in that not everyone wanted to act on their favorite sexual fantasy of all time," study author Justin J. Lehmiller told <a href="https://www.psypost.org/2020/09/one-third-of-people-in-monogamous-relationships-fantasize-about-being-in-some-type-of-open-relationship-study-suggests-58102" target="_blank">PsyPost</a>. "This suggests that fantasies may serve different functions for different people."</p><p>Even though most participants said they want to act out their fantasy in the future, far fewer reported acting out sexual fantasies in the past. Other findings included:</p><ul><li>Men were more likely to fantasize about CNMRs.</li><li>So were people who scored high in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotophilia#:~:text=Erotophilia%20is%20a%20personality%20trait,ranging%20from%20erotophobia%20to%20erotophilia." target="_blank">erotophilia</a> and sociosexual orientation.</li><li>The psychological predictors of fantasizing about CNMRs differed from predictors about infidelity fantasies.</li></ul>
Do open relationships work?<p>A <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2019.1669133" target="_blank">2019 study</a> from psychologists at the University of Rochester suggests it <em>is </em>possible<em>, </em>but especially when both partners practice a trio of behaviors: consent, communication, and comfort — or, the Triple-C Model.<br></p>But the study also suggests not all forms of open relationships are equally viable. For example, people in one-sided CNMRs — where one partner stays monogamous, the other seeks outside sexual relationships — were nearly three times more dissatisfied in their relationships than the monogamous group <em>and </em>the consensual non-monogamous group.
The results of this study showed depressive symptoms being highest in adolescence, declining in early adulthood and then climbing back up again into one's early 30s.