Once a week.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
The keto diet helps men – not women – lose weight, new research suggests
One group of women still seem to benefit from the popular diet.
- Medical professionals and dieters have long noticed differences in the efficacy of the keto diet between the sexes.
- A new study suggests that estrogen plays a role in preventing women from losing weight on the keto diet.
- More research is needed before scientists know exactly how the keto diet's effects vary between the sexes.
It's long been observed that men seem to have an easier time than women in terms of losing weight on the keto diet. The results of a new study on the keto diet's effects on mice support that anecdotal claim, suggesting that sexual hormones might prevent the high-fat diet from helping females lose weight.
At the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society on Sunday, researchers from the University of Iowa discussed a soon-to-be-published study showing how female mice on the keto diet were less likely than males to lose weight, and more likely to experienced impaired blood sugar control.
In the experiments, researchers put a group of mice on the keto diet or a regular diet, which served as the control.
- Keto diet: 75 percent fat, 3 percent carbs, 8 percent protein
- Regular diet: 7 percent fat, 47 percent carbs, 19 percent protein
After 15 weeks on the keto diet, the male mice experienced losses of body weight and body fat, while the female group actually gained weight. The researchers speculated that estrogen might be interfering with the weight-loss process, so they removed ovaries from some of the mice. This caused females to start experiencing the same weight-loss effects observed in the male group.
"Our studies suggest that sex hormones might modulate the way that male versus female mice respond to ketogenic diets," lead investigator Jesse Cochran, a research assistant at the University of Iowa, told Inverse.
The male mice experienced another, less desirable change: Their livers showed stronger signs of fibrosis — the thickening and scarring of connective tissue — and fatty storage than the female mice. The males had higher levels of a hormone called FG21, which previous studies have shown is released in response to liver damage.
Is the keto diet bad for the liver?
The intuitive answer might be yes, considering the keto diet calls for eating lots of fats, and having too much fat (particularly triglycerides) in your liver can lead to inflammation and cell death. However, some research suggests that a responsibly implemented keto diet can actually improve liver health.
For example, a 2018 study tracked the effects of the keto diet on 10 mildly obese people with fatty livers. Ann Fernholm, science journalist and founder of the not-for-profit Dietary Science Foundation, said the study offered an "extremely detailed map showing what happens when a person cuts down on sugar and starch in their diet.
"The liver metabolism changed almost immediately," she wrote for Diet Doctor. "Instead of creating fat, it started burning it and already in the first day you could see a significant reduction in liver fat. As a great side effect, the participants also improved their cholesterol profiles. The microbiome also changed. A surprising discovery was that it started producing more folic acid, a vitamin which is important in the liver's metabolism. Low levels of folic acid has earlier been associated with an increased risk of fatty liver."
Still, more research is needed
Despite its popularity, there's still much scientists don't know about the keto diet, and most medical professionals stop short of recommending the diet unless it's prescribed to epileptics.
"The keto diet is primarily used to help reduce the frequency of epileptic seizures in children," said registered dietitian Kathy McManus, director of the Department of Nutrition at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women's Hospital. "While it also has been tried for weight loss, only short-term results have been studied, and the results have been mixed. We don't know if it works in the long term, nor whether it's safe."
The mixed results on keto diet studies could be explained, in part, by discrepancies in efficacy between the sexes, and a lack of solid research on how females respond to the diet.
"Most studies of the ketogenic diet for weight loss have taken place in small numbers of patients or in only male mice, so sex-based differences in response to this diet are unclear," said senior investigator E. Dale Abel, M.D., Ph.D., chair of the University of Iowa Department of Internal Medicine and president-elect of the Endocrine Society.
Regarding the recent research, it remains unclear whether similar studies conducted with human participants would yield the same results.
Can the keto diet work for some women?
Interestingly, the recent study suggests it can.
"[The finding that ovariectomized mice experienced weight loss] suggests that postmenopausal women could potentially experience better weight loss outcomes with the ketogenic diet compared to younger women," Cochran said.
This seems to match the observations of some medical professionals prior to the recent research.
"My anecdotal observation in my medical office and working with people online is that men perform better in nutritional ketosis compared with women, particularly women aged 40 and older," wrote Sara Gottfried, a board-certified gynecologist, on her website. "My female patients, myself included, have more problems on keto with their stress hormones (i.e. producing too much cortisol), thyroid function, and may develop menstrual irregularities. At the root of these problems is dysfunction of the control system for hormones, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-thyroid-gonadal (HPATG) axis."
Since the initial use of ketogenic diets (KD) as adjunctive treatment for epilepsy, these diets are being increasingly used to promote weight loss and to reduce the risk of metabolic sequelae of severe obesity. Typical KD are very low in carbohydrate and high in fat, promoting hepatic production of ketone bodies. Most animal studies tend to be performed in male mice, and few studies have evaluated gender differences in response to KD. To explore sex differences in response to KD, female and male wild-type mice on the C57BL/6J background were fed either a control diet (CD- 7% fat, 47% carb., 19% protein) or KD (75% fat, 3% carb., 8% protein), following weaning. Females on the CD manifested higher levels of circulating β-hydroxybutyrate (β-HB) than males (2.86-fold, p<0.05). Circulating β-HB concentrations increased with KD in males and females (1.30-fold & 5.05-fold, p<10-4& p<0.01 respectively) with higher concentrations in females. After 15 weeks of feeding, females on KD displayed an increase in body weight (1.07-fold KD vs. CD, p<0.05) while body weight declined in males (0.88-fold, p<0.05). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis revealed elevated lean mass in 18-week old females (1.07-fold, p<0.05), but a significant reduction in fat mass in males (0.49-fold, p<0.05) relative to sex-matched mice on CD. The female mice on KD developed impaired glucose tolerance with a 1.35-fold increase in glucose tolerance test area under the curve (GTT AUC) (p<0.001) relative to CD females. In contrast, fasting glucose levels were lower in males on KD (131.8 ± 12.5 mg/ dl vs. 169.2 ± 6.3 mg/dl, p<0.05). Despite no significant change in GTT AUC, the male mice on KD displayed elevated blood glucose concentrations 30 minutes after injection relative to males on CD (344.9 ± 18.7 mg/ dl vs. 272.0 ± 10.31 mg/dl, p<0.05). However, after 120 minutes, blood glucose levels returned to initial levels. To further investigate the role of estrogen in this sexual dimorphism, female mice were ovariectomized (OVX) and randomized to receive either a CD or KD after weaning. At 15 weeks old, OVX mice on KD displayed decreased body weight (0.84-fold, p<0.0001) and fat mass (0.65-fold, p<0.001) relative to CD-fed mice. Despite changes in body composition, OVX mice on KD still exhibited impaired glucose tolerance with a 1.4-fold increase in GTT AUC comparable to OVX mice on CD (p<0.05). In conclusion, significant sex differences exist in terms of body composition and metabolism in response to ketogenic diet, which may partially be attributed to estrogen.
What is human dignity? Here's a primer, told through 200 years of great essays, lectures, and novels.
- Human dignity means that each of our lives have an unimpeachable value simply because we are human, and therefore we are deserving of a baseline level of respect.
- That baseline requires more than the absence of violence, discrimination, and authoritarianism. It means giving individuals the freedom to pursue their own happiness and purpose.
- We look at incredible writings from the last 200 years that illustrate the push for human dignity in regards to slavery, equality, communism, free speech and education.
The inherent worth of all human beings<p>Human dignity is the inherent worth of each individual human being. Recognizing human dignity means respecting human beings' special value—value that sets us apart from other animals; value that is intrinsic and cannot be lost.</p> <p>Liberalism—the broad political philosophy that organizes society around liberty, justice, and equality—is rooted in the idea of human dignity. Liberalism assumes each of our lives, plans, and preferences have some unimpeachable value, not because of any objective evaluation or contribution to a greater good, but simply because they belong to a human being. We are human, and therefore deserving of a baseline level of respect. </p> <p>Because so many of us take human dignity for granted—just a fact of our humanness—it's usually only when someone's dignity is ignored or violated that we feel compelled to talk about it. </p> <p>But human dignity means more than the absence of violence, discrimination, and authoritarianism. It means giving individuals the freedom to pursue their own happiness and purpose—a freedom that can be hampered by restrictive social institutions or the tyranny of the majority. The liberal ideal of the good society is not just peaceful but also pluralistic: It is a society in which we respect others' right to think and live differently than we do.</p>
From the 19th century to today<p>With <a href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?year_start=1800&year_end=2019&content=human+dignity&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Chuman%20dignity%3B%2Cc0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Google Books Ngram Viewer</a>, we can chart mentions of human dignity from 1800-2019.</p><img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDg0ODU0My9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1MTUwMzE4MX0.bu0D_0uQuyNLyJjfRESNhu7twkJ5nxu8pQtfa1w3hZs/img.png?width=980" id="7ef38" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9974c7bef3812fcb36858f325889e3c6" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
American novelist, writer, playwright, poet, essayist and civil rights activist James Baldwin at his home in Saint-Paul-de-Vence, southern France, on November 6, 1979.
Credit: Ralph Gatti/AFP via Getty Images
The future of dignity<p>Around the world, people are still working toward the full and equal recognition of human dignity. Every year, new speeches and writings help us understand what dignity is—not only what it looks like when dignity is violated but also what it looks like when dignity is honored. In his posthumous essay, Congressman Lewis wrote, "When historians pick up their pens to write the story of the 21st century, let them say that it was your generation who laid down the heavy burdens of hate at last and that peace finally triumphed over violence, aggression and war."</p> <p>The more we talk about human dignity, the better we understand it. And the sooner we can make progress toward a shared vision of peace, freedom, and mutual respect for all. </p>
With just a few strategical tweaks, the Nazis could have won one of World War II's most decisive battles.
- The Battle of Britain is widely recognized as one of the most significant battles that occurred during World War II. It marked the first major victory of the Allied forces and shifted the tide of the war.
- Historians, however, have long debated the deciding factor in the British victory and German defeat.
- A new mathematical model took into account numerous alternative tactics that the German's could have made and found that just two tweaks stood between them and victory over Britain.
Two strategic blunders<p>Now, historians and mathematicians from York St. John University have collaborated to produce <a href="http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~nm15/bootstrapBoB%20AAMS.docx" target="_blank">a statistical model (docx download)</a> capable of calculating what the likely outcomes of the Battle of Britain would have been had the circumstances been different. </p><p>Would the German war effort have fared better had they not bombed Britain at all? What if Hitler had begun his bombing campaign earlier, even by just a few weeks? What if they had focused their targets on RAF airfields for the entire course of the battle? Using a statistical technique called weighted bootstrapping, the researchers studied these and other alternatives.</p><p>"The weighted bootstrap technique allowed us to model alternative campaigns in which the Luftwaffe prolongs or contracts the different phases of the battle and varies its targets," said co-author Dr. Jaime Wood in a <a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2020/research/mathematicians-battle-britain-what-if-scenarios/" target="_blank">statement</a>. Based on the different strategic decisions that the German forces could have made, the researchers' model enabled them to predict the likelihood that the events of a given day of fighting would or would not occur.</p><p>"The Luftwaffe would only have been able to make the necessary bases in France available to launch an air attack on Britain in June at the earliest, so our alternative campaign brings forward the air campaign by three weeks," continued Wood. "We tested the impact of this and the other counterfactuals by varying the probabilities with which we choose individual days."</p><p>Ultimately, two strategic tweaks shifted the odds significantly towards the Germans' favor. Had the German forces started their campaign earlier in the year and had they consistently targeted RAF airfields, an Allied victory would have been extremely unlikely.</p><p>Say the odds of a British victory in the real-world Battle of Britain stood at 50-50 (there's no real way of knowing what the actual odds are, so we'll just have to select an arbitrary figure). If this were the case, changing the start date of the campaign and focusing only on airfields would have reduced British chances at victory to just 10 percent. Even if a British victory stood at 98 percent, these changes would have cut them down to just 34 percent.</p>
A tool for understanding history<p>This technique, said co-author Niall Mackay, "demonstrates just how finely-balanced the outcomes of some of the biggest moments of history were. Even when we use the actual days' events of the battle, make a small change of timing or emphasis to the arrangement of those days and things might have turned out very differently."</p><p>The researchers also claimed that their technique could be applied to other uncertain historical events. "Weighted bootstrapping can provide a natural and intuitive tool for historians to investigate unrealized possibilities, informing historical controversies and debates," said Mackay.</p><p>Using this technique, researchers can evaluate other what-ifs and gain insight into how differently influential events could have turned out if only the slightest things had changed. For now, at least, we can all be thankful that Hitler underestimated Britain's grit.</p>
A new study shows our planet is much closer to the supermassive black hole at the galaxy's center than previously estimated.
Arrows on this map show position and velocity data for the 224 objects utilized to model the Milky Way Galaxy. The solid black lines point to the positions of the spiral arms of the Galaxy. Colors reflect groups of objects that are part of the same arm, while the background is a simulation image.
Apple sold its first iPod in 2001, and six years later it introduced the iPhone, which ushered in a new era of personal technology.