Heatwaves significantly impact male fertility, says huge study

As the world gets hotter, men may have fewer and fewer viable sperm

  • New research on beetles shows that successive exposure to heatwaves reduces male fertility, sometimes to the point of sterility.
  • The research has implications both for how the insect population will sustain itself as well as how human fertility may work on an increasingly hotter Earth.
  • With this and other evidence, it is becoming clear that more common and more extreme heatwaves may be the most dangerous aspect of climate change.

When we hear that climate change causes "extreme weather events," our minds jump to hurricanes ripping palm trees out of the ground or snowstorms burying cars. But one of the most dangerous kind of extreme weather event is much less visible than, say, a tornado tearing the roof of a house. Heatwaves kill more people than all other weather events combined, and they're on the rise.

During the summer of 2003, an estimated 70,000 Europeans died when a deadly heatwave swept through the region. As the globe continues to warm, 150 Americans are projected to die every summer day by the mid-2040s. Aside from directly causing death from heatstroke, dehydration, other heat-related conditions, high heat also weakens cognition. Violent crimes, too, tend to spike on hotter-than-average days.

Now, a new study has uncovered another threat posed by heatwaves. It turns out the prolonged exposure to high heat reduces male fertility, and repeated exposure to successive heatwaves can even cause sterility.

Studying reproductive performance under heatwave conditions

Wikimedia Commons

This image shows the temperature anomalies across Europe during the devastating 2006 heatwave.

The study, recently published in Nature, examined the sperm viability of red flour beetles under heatwave conditions. In a corresponding blog post, study co-author Matthew Gage wrote, "a wealth of research since the start of last century, mainly on warm-blooded mammals (including humans), has shown that environmental or experimental warming by even a few degrees can cause declines in sperm quality and male ability to fertilise."

He points out that most of these studies have been conducted on endothermic, or warm-blooded, animals, but very few studies have been conducted on exothermic, or cold-blooded, animals like insects. Given that the vast majority of animals are ectothermic and that insects serve as food or pollinators for many animals and plants, understanding how climate change affects these creatures is critical to preserving our ecosystem. What's more, studying sperm viability in insects serves as a model for how heatwaves will affect other animals—like humans.

What did they find?

The researchers exposed red flour beetles (like this one) to high-heat conditions to observe their reproductive performance. (Wikimedia Commons)

The researchers exposed their beetles to heatwave-like conditions over the course of five days. Male red flour beetles like temperatures at about 35 degrees Celsius, or 95 degrees Fahrenheit. The experiment exposed them to an environment that was 42 degrees Celsius, or 107.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Depending on where you live, that may sound like an unlikely temperature, but the authors noted that over 90 countries experience heatwaves in that temperature range or higher.

After their extended sauna session, the beetles were given the chance to mate with a female of the species. Compared to male beetles in the control group, the heat-exposed beetles didn't do so well. They produced 75% less sperm, and only one third of their sperm was viable. Overall, the heat-exposed beetles' reproductive performance was cut in half.

But nature is adaptable, right? One might expect the beetles to eventually get over the initial shock of their new, hot environment and perform better. This research showed that, if anything, the opposite is true, at least in the short term. A second exposure to heatwave conditions made the beetles almost completely sterile.

It gets worse; not only did the heat-exposed male beetles do worse than their cooler peers, their male offspring were also less fertile than the offspring of the control beetles. Even when this new generation of beetles was not exposed to heatwave conditions, they had a 25% reduction in mating success. What's more, they lived significantly shorter lives than the control beetles, too.

We've known for a while that certain environmental conditions can affect the health and fertility of offspring, but usually this is in response to irradiation, exposure to toxic chemicals, or stress. When an animal is exposed to an unhealthy environment, the genetic material contained in their sperm becomes damaged, hamstringing the next generation's ability to reproduce. This research suggests that exposure to high heat damages offspring's reproductive ability in the same way.

The environmental impact

While this study looked specifically at beetles, evidence suggests heatwaves will affect mammals in much the same way. Exposing mice to hotter temperatures reduced fertility by 75%, for instance. Overall, "this work reveals that sperm are very sensitive to heat," writes Gage. "Environmentally-relevant experimental heatwaves damage sperm function, leading to reduced fertility and a decline in offspring performance."

If this effect is widespread enough, it could throw a serious monkey wrench into the inner workings of our ecosystem. The importance of insects in the diets of large animals cannot be overstated. As the globe continues to warm, insect populations are crashing. One study in Germany found that the local insect population had dropped by 78% in just 24 years, which appears to be part of a global trend. While it can't be said that this is entirely due to increasingly common and extreme heatwaves, this research suggests that they may play a major role.



Stand up against religious discrimination – even if it’s not your religion

As religious diversity increases in the United States, we must learn to channel religious identity into interfaith cooperation.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Religious diversity is the norm in American life, and that diversity is only increasing, says Eboo Patel.
  • Using the most painful moment of his life as a lesson, Eboo Patel explains why it's crucial to be positive and proactive about engaging religious identity towards interfaith cooperation.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

The biggest threat to America? Americans.

Pulitzer Prize-winner Jared Diamond explains why some nations make it through epic crises and why others fail.

Videos
  • "A country is not going to resolve a national crisis unless it acknowledges that it's in a crisis," says Jared Diamond. "If you don't, you're going to get nowhere. Many Americans still don't recognize today that the United States is descending into a crisis."
  • The U.S. tends to focus on "bad countries" like China, Canada and Mexico as the root of its problems, however Diamond points out the missing piece: Americans are generating their own problems.
  • The crisis the U.S. is experiencing is not cause for despair. The U.S. has survived many tragedies, such as the War of Independence and the Great Depression – history is proof that the U.S. can get through this current crisis too.
Keep reading Show less

10 new things we’ve learned about death

If you don't want to know anything about your death, consider this your spoiler warning.

Culture & Religion
  • For centuries cultures have personified death to give this terrifying mystery a familiar face.
  • Modern science has demystified death by divulging its biological processes, yet many questions remain.
  • Studying death is not meant to be a morbid reminder of a cruel fate, but a way to improve the lives of the living.
Keep reading Show less

Where the evidence of fake news is really hiding

When it comes to sniffing out whether a source is credible or not, even journalists can sometimes take the wrong approach.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • We all think that we're competent consumers of news media, but the research shows that even journalists struggle with identifying fact from fiction.
  • When judging whether a piece of media is true or not, most of us focus too much on the source itself. Knowledge has a context, and it's important to look at that context when trying to validate a source.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less