Famous fossil is not an Archaeopteryx feather after all
Lasers solve the mystery of the missing quill.
- The famous fossilized feather found in the 1860s is from some unknown animal.
- The fossil's missing quill has long kept its identity unknown.
- We're just at the beginning of our awareness of feathered dinosaurs.
Some time in the early 1860s, at the Solnhofen Community Quarry located about halfway between Munich and Nuremburg in Germany, a fossilized feather was discovered in shale deposits. The first mention of it appeared in 1861, in letters from paleontologist Christian Erich Hermann von Meyer — who described its appearance on two facing slabs of stone — to the editor of the German journal "Jahrbuch für Mineralogie". von Meyer proposed the feather be named Archaeopteryx lithographica. Six weeks later, von Meyer again wrote to announce a second discovery: A nearly complete skeleton of a feathered dinosaur found in the same deposits. The closeness of the timing and location caused the two finds to be linked together, with the feather considered the singular piece of evidence — the holotype — of a bird-like dinosaur to be called Archaeopteryx. Now, a new analysis of the fossil using Laser-Stimulated Fluorescence (LSF) has revealed, nearly 160 years later, that the two actually had nothing to do with each other other than proximity. Nature's Scientific Reports published the surprising result.
The case of the missing quill
One of the obstacles to a thorough understanding of the fossil has been that the feather it depicts has no quill, or calamus. Analysis of the calamus would have allowed scientists to ascertain the source of the feather on the animal from which it came. Was it a large primary wing feather, a secondary feather from the smaller secondary wing, or a tail feather called a primary covert?
When the discovery of the feather became public in 1862, the feather was described as having a calamus, and von Meyer drew it with one. However, there's nothing there to the naked eye or when the fossil is viewed under x-ray fluorescence or with UV imaging.

(Kaye, et al)
Original drawing by von Meyer, top. Fossil under white light today, bottom
Enter Laser-Stimulated Fluorescence
A microscopic examination of the fossil revealed to the authors of the new paper, led by Thomas G. Kaye, that there had originally been a quill present, but that "past preparation had engraved around the outline of the feather and inadvertently prepared away the calamus at some unknown point in the past."
The LSF uses a high-powered laser to expose geochemical differences between the fossil and the stone background. The chemicals fluoresce with different colors. In the end, LSF was able to recover the geochemical halo left behind by the missing materials. The halo perfectly matched von Meyer's drawing, as well, providing even more confidence of its accuracy.
The feather is, in fact, a primary covert. But there's something else.

(Kaye, et al)
LSF image of feather fossil with calamus halo
The Archaeopteryx lithographica is not from an Archaeopteryx
In the years since the 1860s, other specimens of feathered dinosaurs have been found, including 11 or 12 specimens of Archaeopteryx, notably one residing in a Berlin museum. While the newly identified primary covert somewhat resembles the Berlin specimen's secondary feathering — its closest match among all existing Archaeopteryx specimens — they're clearly not the same.

(Kay, et al)
Drawing of the 1860s feather superimposed over its closest match from the Berlin specimen
So, whose feather is it?
While it could be that the fossil is of an Archaeopteryx feather not yet catalogued, the greater likelihood is that it belonged to some other, thus far undiscovered feathered dinosaur. The inevitable implication? There were more bird-like dinosaurs in the Jurassic than we realized.
Related Articles Around the Web
- They Had Feathers: Is the World Ready to See Dinosaurs as They ... ›
- Siberian Discovery Suggests Almost All Dinosaurs Were Feathered ›
- First discovered fossil feather did not belong to iconic bird ... ›
- First fossil feather didn't belong to famed Archaeopteryx bird - UPI.com ›
- Scientists may have solved the mystery surrounding first fossil ... ›
Got a question for a real NASA astronomer? Ask it here!
NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller is coming back to Big Think to answer YOUR questions! Here's all you need to know to submit your science-related inquiries.
20 February, 2019
Videos
Big Think's amazing audience has responded so well to our videos from NASA astronomer and Assistant Director for Science Communication Michelle Thaller that we couldn't wait to bring her back for more!
And this time, she's ready to tackle any questions you're willing to throw at her, like, "How big is the Universe?", "Am I really made of stars?" or, "How long until Elon Musk starts a colony on Mars?"
All you have to do is submit your questions to the form below, and we'll use them for an upcoming Q+A session with Michelle. You know what to do, Big Thinkers!
Keep reading
Show less
Enter the Lumina Prize! A search for the next big idea in education.
Lumina Foundation is partnering with Big Think to unearth the next large-scale, rapid innovation in post-high school education. Enter the competition here!
30 January, 2019
New study finds strength of imagination not associated with creative ability or achievement
If you have a strong imagination, this won't help you with academic study.
20 February, 2019
Mind & Brain
Imagination is sometimes claimed to be a uniquely human ability, and it has long intrigued psychologists. "Nevertheless, our understanding of the benefits and risks that individual differences in imagination hold for psychological outcomes is currently limited," note two researchers who have created a new psychometric test – the Imaginative Behaviour Engagement Scale (IBES) – for measuring how much imagination a person has, and then used it to investigate whether, as some earlier work hinted, having a stronger imagination might aid learning and creativity.
Keep reading
Show less
7 common traits of self-transcended people
Maslow's highest level on the hierarchy of needs.
19 February, 2019
Shutterstock/Big Think
Personal Growth
- Self-transcendence is the final and oft forgotten peak of Maslow's pyramid.
- Before transcending yourself, however, you need to be self-actualized.
- The foundation of self-transcended people is caring for others and higher ideals.
Keep reading
Show less
Why are conservatives healthier than liberals? Personal responsibility, study suggests.
An emphasis on personal responsibility might explain why conservatives tend to be in better physical health than liberals.
20 February, 2019
Pixabay
Personal Growth
- A growing body of research suggests there's some relationship between our measurable personality traits and our political beliefs.
- A recent study examined the relationship between political beliefs, personal responsibility and overall health.
- The results suggest that an emphasis on responsibility might explain health differences between liberals and conservatives.
Keep reading
Show less

Big think's weekly newsletter.
Get smarter faster from the comfort of your inbox.
See our newsletter privacy policy here

Most Popular
Most Recent
Big think's weekly newsletter.
Get smarter faster from the comfort of your inbox.
See our newsletter privacy policy here

© Copyright 2007-2018 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK EDGE,
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.