Skip to content
Strange Maps

China Sets Its Sights on Taiwan

Nothing fans the flames of nationalism like the sense of historical wrongs as yet “unrighted.”

By building islands and stationing soldiers where before there were only reefs and sea turtles, China has literally cemented its territorial claims in the South China Sea. The Middle Kingdom seems confident that its sheer economic size and growing military might will defeat the overlapping claims of other countries. Should Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Indonesia eventually accept China’s takeover of the area as a fait accompli, that would also be a defeat for the U.S.

Since its much-vaunted “pivot to Asia” a few years back, Washington’s undeclared policy has been to counterbalance Beijing’s growing geopolitical ambitions in the region. However, if Beijing manages to take possession of the Spratlys, Paracels, and other disputed islands, banks, and reefs without a fight, it will have successfully called Washington’s bluff. America’s allies in the region will wonder if the U.S. will do anything to come to their defense. It will make the next item on China’s wish list that much easier to acquire.

That such a wish list exists, can be glanced from the new passports China introduced in 2012. They’re watermarked with a map of China that not only includes Taiwan (as could be expected), but also the disputed maritime areas in the South China Sea, and some territories also claimed (and currently administered) by India.

Irredentist map on China’s new passports 

But Chinese irredentism runs much deeper than that. As daunting as it is now, China throughout much of the 19th and 20th centuries was the “Sick Man of Asia,” and outside powers abused the Empire’s weakness to obtain concessions, be they territorial or commercial. Nothing fans the flames of nationalism like the sense of historical wrongs as yet un-righted, so these ‘unequal treaties’ feature prominently in Chinese school curriculums.

This is not a recent development, nor is the present Communist regime the first to exploit these injustices for its own purposes. The map shown is one of several that populated the textbooks of elementary schools in 1930s nationalist China, usually titled “A Map of National Shame” (國恥地圖) or something like it. It shows the territorial expanse of the Chinese Empire in all its former glory. This mega-China runs as far west as the Aral Sea and as far east as Sakhalin Island; it incorporates both Afghanistan and Singapore, and virtually all lands and territories in between.

The pink bit in the middle shows the extent of China’s borders in the republican period. This already was an exercise in wish-fulfillment, as Japan was occupying a large part of coastal China, and much of the interior was ruled by warlords. Nevertheless, “pink” China also comprised the now independent state of Mongolia and (by the look of it) also Tuva, now a part of Russia (and home of the famous throat singers). A wide belt of green and red indicates territories unjustly detached from the Chinese motherland. These include: 

+ Russia’s Far East

+ The entire Korean peninsula

+ The Ryukyu Islands (a much wider range than the currently disputed Senkaku Islands)

+ Taiwan (aka the “Republic of China” – with its own irredentist claims, see #221)

+ The South China Sea

+ All the currently independent nations of Southeast Asia, i.e. Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Burma/Myanmar, Malaysia, and Singapore

+ Bhutan and Nepal

+ Northern parts of Pakistan and India

+ Afghanistan

+ Large parts of the Central Asian republics

    The blue line demarcates the widest extent of the Chinese Empire. It should be pointed out, however, that this is a very generous and somewhat misleading definition of what constituted the Chinese Empire, as it also includes states that merely paid tribute to it without otherwise falling under its sway.

    Smarter faster: the Big Think newsletter
    Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday

    China remains committed to a policy of “peaceful rise”; the list of “official” territorial disputes is fairly short (and includes, of course, the South China Sea and, for example, most of the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, which China calls “South Tibet”). But perhaps these old school maps may some day be de-dustified. One Indian geostrategist claims to have insight into the People’s Liberation Army’s timetable for China’s not-so-peaceful rise:

    1. Unification with Taiwan (2020-2025)
    2. Recovery of islands in the South China Sea (2025-2030)
    3. Recovery of Southern Tibet / India’s Arunachal Pradesh (2035-2040)
    4. Recovery of Diaoyutai/Senkaku and Ryukyus (2045-2050)
    5. Unification with “Outer Mongolia” (2045-2050)
    6. Recovery of territory seized by Russia (2055-2060)

      China’s current president Xi Jinping will probably still be in power in 2019, when the Chinese Communist Party celebrates its 100th birthday. Announcing the return of Taiwan to the Motherland would be a nice birthday present.

      Overview of China’s passport map taken here from the website of the Uyghur American Association. The Map of Shame found here at Public Culture. The PLA’s geostrategic timetable found here at Depensa.

      Strange Maps #759

      Got a strange map? Let me know at [email protected].


      Up Next