Race Relations Need Big and Small Solutions
An innovative idea from a Knight Foundation challenge might have kernels of wisdom for race relations policy.
In mid-April a Gallup poll found that the percentage of people who are worried “a great deal” by the issue of race relations has increased to 35 percent, over one in three people. That’s a big difference from the time period between 2001 and 2010, when the number of people in that category was on the decline.
Some people have taken it into their own hands to try and solve divisions — not just of race, but also of class, gender, and many of the other identities that separate neighbors. A project called The Longest Table recently won a grant by the Knight Foundation to literally set out a giant table the length of two city blocks in downtown Tallahassee.
Conversation starters decked the table, asking about race relations, local challenges, and what people like the most about the city. The table was visited by residents, local leaders, and community activists. The idea was that sharing a table promotes the kind of respect and harmony that might otherwise get lost throughout the course of political disagreements.
Setting up enormous tables throughout the U.S. or the rest of the world isn’t likely to solve the deep-seated issues behind tense race relations. And emotions can run high on any side of an argument. President Obama, for instance, was recently frustrated with Black Lives Matter protestors, because he perceived them as unwilling to work through concrete solutions on criminal justice. Others are indignant at the remarks, saying that they have already made efforts to meet and work on policy. So, it’s clearly tough to work through problems.
But what if there is something to the idea of bringing more compassion into policy? In other areas, such as elementary school education, we’ve seen that teaching empathy is sorely needed. It’s possible the giant table is one strategy for introducing just a little more empathy practice to our lives that sorely lack it. And if we thought past large tables, could there be more effective, deeper solutions?
Image: UWE MEINHOLD / Stringer (Getty Images)
Under capitalism, the argument goes, it's every man for himself. Through the relentless pursuit of self-interest, everyone benefits, as if an invisible hand were guiding each of us toward the common good. Everyone should accordingly try to get as much as they can, not only for their goods but also for their labour. Whatever the market price is is, in turn, what the buyer should pay. Just like the idea that there should be a minimum wage, the idea that there should be a maximum wage seems to undermine the very freedom that the free market is supposed to guarantee.
Humans evolved to live in the cold through a number of environmental and genetic factors.
- According to some relatively new research, many of our early human cousins preceded Homo sapien migrations north by hundreds of thousands or even millions of years.
- Cross-breeding with other ancient hominids gave some subsets of human population the genes to contend and thrive in colder and harsher climates.
- Behavioral and dietary changes also helped humans adapt to cold climates.
It's unlikely that there's anything on the planet that is worth the cost of shipping it back
- In the second season of National Geographic Channel's MARS (premiering tonight, 11/12/18,) privatized miners on the red planet clash with a colony of international scientists
- Privatized mining on both Mars and the Moon is likely to occur in the next century
- The cost of returning mined materials from Space to the Earth will probably be too high to create a self-sustaining industry, but the resources may have other uses at their origin points
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.