A New Kind of Poverty, Turbo-Charged by Inequality

Sasha Abramsky argues that poverty today is a symptom of profound levels of inequality. 

If our great-great grandparents pulled a Rip Van Winkle and woke up from a deep slumber today, says the journalist Sasha Abramsky, they would recognize the levels of inequality, and the poverty that stems from this inequality, all around them. Our great-grandparents and grandparents, on the other hand, would be quite shocked.


Abramsky is the author of The American Way of Poverty: How the Other Half Still Lives, a project that he developed as an update of Michael Harrington's The Other America: Poverty in the United States. In the early 1960s, Abramsky says, there was a widespread idea that poverty had disappeared in the U.S. Harrington not only proved that this idea was nonsense, he also shamed the country into action. His book deeply influenced members of the Kennedy administration and eventually led to President Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty." 

So how exactly does poverty today compare to Harrington's time? 

Abramsky details the expansion of poverty into "corners of the country that didn't experience it in previous decades." In an interview with Jeff Schechtman on Specific Gravity, Abramsky says that the type of poverty that we are seeing not only in rural and urban areas - but spread out throughout suburbia as well, is "a direct result of choices made or not made politically." 

People are struggling with the cost of health care and juggling debt. These Americans used to be regarded as the "hidden America," but Abramsky describes them as your neighbors today. Maybe he is even describing you. 

And so as Congress debates policies today - whether it is food stamps or head start - that impact the growing number of people living on the margins, Schechtman asks Abramsky if we need a new "war on poverty" today. 

Listen here:

Click here to listen on your iphone or ipad

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Top Video Splash
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this happens in the pharmaceutical world, certain companies stay at the top of the ladder, through broadly-protected patents, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation — "tweaks" — the same as product invention.