Social justice

Many of my educational leadership colleagues across the country would say that they are working in the area of social justice. They write articles with titles like Expanding the landscape of social justice: A critical ecological analysis; Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy; School leadership reforms: Filtering social justice through dominant discourses; and Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory.

From conferences and other interactions, I know these folks and can say

with complete certainty that they all are absolutely top-notch

scholars. I also know each and every one of these articles is

well-researched, well-reasoned, well-regarded, and well-meaning.

That said, I'm troubled by the fact that educational leadership

folks (faculty and K-12 leaders both) aren't talking more about digital

technologies and future employability when they talk about social justice.

Indeed, I rarely hear mention of technology at all within these

contexts. I'd like to see more discussion in both K-12 and higher ed

about the future world that disadvantaged kids are going to live in and

what we need to do to boost their digital participation, citizenship,

and employability opportunities.

NCLB is framed as social justice legislation, but its basic premise

is that boosting disadvantaged students' performance on industrial-era

skills is socially just practice. Similarly, we talk about the digital divide

mostly in terms of giving kids access to computers and the Internet and

not so much in terms of teaching them how to be effective participants

in a technologically-suffused, globally-interconnected future.

It's not enough to give disadvantaged students access to digital

technologies. They also need opportunities to learn to use those

technologies in ways that will enhance their opportunities to be

fully-functioning members of our future society. Disadvantaged students

are the ones most in need of these pedagogical opportunities because

their families and communities are less likely to have the means to

provide such opportunities outside of school. I read a quote from

someone (and I dearly wish I could remember who said it) that said

something like "poor kids have things done to them by computers, while

affluent kids get to do things with computers." The author's premise

was that even when disadvantaged students get to use computers in

schools, too often it's for drill-and-kill, repetitive, basic fact work

rather than them getting to use computers in creative, collaborative,

problem-solving ways. I think the author was deadly correct regarding

many, many schools.

Many of us education bloggers write a lot about transforming

classroom practice to reflect the needs of a new world: we often call

it 'School 2.0.' Is School 2.0 the ultimate

social justice issue for disadvantaged students? Is School 2.0 the most

critical social justice issue of our time if disadvantaged students

aren't going to be left even further behind than they already are? If

so, why aren't we framing more of our technology initiatives and

discussion in this way? Where's our moral imperative?

This post also is available at the TechLearning blog.

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less
Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Do human beings have a magnetic sense? Biologists know other animals do. They think it helps creatures including bees, turtles and birds navigate through the world.

Keep reading Show less

Harvard: Men who can do 40 pushups have a 'significantly' lower risk of heart disease

Turns out pushups are more telling than treadmill tests when it comes to cardiovascular health.

Airman 1st Class Justin Baker completes another push-up during the First Sergeants' push-up a-thon June 28, 2011, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Participants were allowed 10 minutes to do as many push-ups as they could during the fundraiser. Airman Baker, a contract specialist assigned to the 354th Contracting Squadron, completed 278 push-ups. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Janine Thibault)
Surprising Science
  • Men who can perform 40 pushups in one minute are 96 percent less likely to have cardiovascular disease than those who do less than 10.
  • The Harvard study focused on over 1,100 firefighters with a median age of 39.
  • The exact results might not be applicable to men of other age groups or to women, researchers warn.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. reacts to New Zealand's gun ban

On Thursday, New Zealand moved to ban an array of semi-automatic guns and firearms components following a mass shooting that killed 50 people.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Gun control supporters are pointing to the ban as an example of swift, decisive action that the U.S. desperately needs.
  • Others note the inherent differences between the two nations, arguing that it is a good thing that it is relatively hard to pass such legislation in such a short timeframe.
  • The ban will surely shape future conversations about gun control in the U.S.
Keep reading Show less