Study finds green tea may reduce Down syndrome facial traits
A questionable new study suggests green tea may be able to reduce the effect of Down syndrome on facial features.
When a child is born with Down syndrome (DS), he or she has three #21 chromosomes rather than the typical two. The medical term for the syndrome is “Trisomy 21,” and it’s the reason 3/21 is celebrated in the U.S. as World Down Syndrome Day. Perhaps, then, it’s no coincidence that there’s been a lot of coverage lately of a newly published Spanish study that suggests a compound in green tea may be able to reduce the facial morphology, the flattened facial profile and nose, indicative of Down syndrome.
The study, published March 8, 2018, looked at the effect of the compound on a computer mouse model, and on an extremely small — some might say “statistically insignificant” — human sample. Within the former, different dosages produced drastically different results, and so the scientists are not recommending the treatment of anyone with green tea extract right now. Still, the research is interesting and worth following going forward.
Understanding Down syndrome
Down syndrome is the most commonly occurring chromosomal condition, occurring in one in every 700 babies born in the U.S., or about 6,000 infants a year. It’s not a disability, though most people with Down syndrome do experience some cognitive disabilities. However, as the National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS) notes, “the effect is usually mild to moderate and is not indicative of the many strengths and talents that each individual possesses nonetheless.” People with Down syndrome live full, rich lives, though statistically have a reduced life expectancy of 60 years. Even so, things are getting better: In 1985, life expectancy was 25 years.
As bioethicist Chris Kaposy writes, however, we as a society have a troubling ambivalence about Down syndrome. One one hand, baby-product maker Gerber has been acclaimed for naming a child with Down syndrome, Lucas Warren, as their 2018 Gerber baby. In contrast, Netflix recently saw nothing wrong with airing a special in which comedian Thom Segura makes fun of people with Down syndrome.
More meaningfully, even as much of society has evolved in its acceptance of people with Down syndrome, it’s still the case that from roughly 60% to 90% of expecting parents informed their child will have Down syndrome choose to terminate the pregnancy.
These statistics indicate that, a Kaposy writes, “there is still enormous reluctance for prospective parents to choose to include children with Down syndrome in their families.” And yet, he says, “When children with Down syndrome are included in their families they tend to become beloved full participants.” (Contrary to some reports, Iceland does not require such terminations and has not eliminated Down syndrome in newborns.)
Families raising children with Down syndrome may not even want to “normalize” their children’s appearance. As Linda Gilmore of Queensland University of Technology in Australia tells New Scientist, “Some are keen to try anything that might make things easier cognitively and socially,” but “Others feel strongly about not changing their child’s personality or appearance — not changing the person they are.”
The study’s findings
The new study looked at the effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a compound found in green tea. It’s known to slow down the production of DYRK1A, an enzyme that may produce a range of Down syndrome characteristics, including its typical facial features.
The researchers studied the effect of EGCG in mouse models, and the results were both encouraging and worrying: “Our results showed that mouse models treated with low dose of EGCG during pre‐ and postnatal development improved facial dysmorphology.
However, the same treatment at high dose produced disparate facial morphology changes with an extremely wide and abnormal range of variation.” As a result, the authors concluded, “Current evidence warns against the non‐prescribed intake of this supplement as a health‐promoting measure.”
Previous reports have linked EGCG to reducing the cognitive effects of Down syndrome — though the research is inconclusive — and some families have already been treating their children with non-prescription, over-the-counter supplements containing the compound. It’s a group of 13 such families from which the human aspect of the new study derives. Again, this is a tiny sample, and with no standardized dosage or timing protocols — each child consumed roughly the equivalent of eight cups of green tea per day — so the families’ experience by no means constitutes a controlled study.
The children were studied in three groups:
- Age 13-18: four children who’d been receiving green-tea extract for since late in adolescence
Age 4-12: two children for whom the report doesn’t specify the age at which treatment began, but is presumably a few years
- Age 0-3: seven children four children who’d been receiving green-tea extract for since early in their development
The researchers conducted structural analyses of children without DS and the children in the study. They examined 3D coordinates for 21 facial landmarks and found that six of the seven 0-3-year-olds exhibited facial features that were most like the non-DS (or “euploid”) children in their age group. The scientists suspect that this is because such the underlying structural development of such young kids is still underway and most susceptible to the influence of EGCG.
Put down that supplement
As we said earlier, this was a small study, and the results of the mouse-modeling element indicated that dosages can be critical both to the success of the treatment and also in avoiding risk. As Jean Maurice Delabar at Paris’ Brain and Spine Institute points out New Scientist, those results suggest that high amounts of EGCG can result is extreme facial and skeletal issues.
- Patients from low-income neighborhoods are most at risk of negative health impacts.
- But increased longevity is a cause for celebration, says Ashton Applewhite, not doom and gloom.
Some evidence attributes a certain neurological phenomenon to a near death experience.
Time of death is considered when a person has gone into cardiac arrest. This is the cessation of the electrical impulse that drive the heartbeat. As a result, the heart locks up. The moment the heart stops is considered time of death. But does death overtake our mind immediately afterward or does it slowly creep in?
- The research raises many ethical questions and puts to the test our current understanding of death.
What's dead may never die, it seems
An ethical gray matter
The dilemma is unprecedented.
Setting new boundaries
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.