David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
from the world's big
Start Learning

"exFEARience", A Scary (and Brilliant) Satire on a Scary Truth; Fear Sells.

            It’s no mystery that fear sells, and for good reason. News stories, products, politics…it doesn’t matter what it is or where you hear about it, if something suggests danger, you’re going to pay attention. You have to. Your brain gives you little choice in the matter. The alternative is that you could possibly die, which is a crappy option, so the brain instinctively draws your attention to anything that could involve a threat.

            Now an ad agency is using the truth of our instinctive, subconscious, beyond-our-own-free-will fearfulness, to satirize the world that sells stuff with fear. They have produced a false ad, actually an ad for their agency, titled exFEARiential. The ad is funny, brilliant, and frighteningly true. Take a look, and come back for a few quick insights from the neuroscience of fear and memory, and the psychology of risk perception, that explain just why this ad is SO true.

     Amazing, huh? The first hint at the underlying neural truth of this fabulous satire comes at 1:03, when “Megan Towers, Exfearience Planner” says “You see, fear releases adrenaline, which is directly released to memory. So we’re literally searing our brand into their minds.” The neuroscience of memory is more complex than that, but Megan’s got the core of it; the brain’s wiring and chemistry magnify the power of signals that carry more meaning and importance…including signals that suggest “YOU COULD DIE!!!!!”. One effect of this magnification is to strengthen the synapses connecting neurons in the networks involved in processing this signal, and to add entirely new synaptic connections to this network, to encode that experience more deeply and powerfully into the web of connections that are the physical manifestation of where those memories exist. This kind of learning is a handy trick, given that the next time we are in that situation, we want to be just a little bit faster at remembering things so maybe we can avoid the risk in the first place, or so we can be faster at remembering how we survived it. As Megan says,  “We want a brand experience that stays with you, that you won’t forget.” Fear will do that, and it’s pretty handy for our survival that it does.

     But there is another fascinating truth about the way we experience and remember fear that exFEARience satirizes…a truth that helps explain why fear not only grabs our attention, but SELLS. As another of the faux agency’s experts says of their new fear-based advertising approach, “Most ads are dramatic. We want them to be traumatic.”

     Traumatic sounds bad. But to the brain, one of the effects of trauma, or to be a little more careful semantically, of really powerful emotional experiences (not only fear but positive experiences too), is how much influence those powerful experiences have on the brain when we recall them. Any memory burned in more powerfully and deeply will come to mind faster than your average run-of-the-mill what-did-I-have-for-breakfast-yesterday sort of recall. Cognitive science has found that the brain apparently knows that if something comes to mind faster, it speaks louder to your perceptions. It somehow knows that it better give that memory more weight, because the experiences that come to consciousness faster meant more when they burned into our memory in the first place.

     The study by Daniel Kahneman and many others of heuristics and biases - the mostly subconscious mental shortcuts we use to turn information into our perceptions and judgments and choices -  has a name for this. They call it the Availability Heuristic. The more ‘available’ something is to our brain…the more readily and powerfully a memory comes to mind…the more influence it has on our perceptions, because the brain knows those memories matter more. The effect of this is that those memories and experiences play a more powerful role on how we see the world, and how worried we are, and therefore on what we buy, and who we vote for.

     Yup. Fear works. It has to. It’s what keeps us alive. The problem is, it works so instinctively that when dangers are being peddled by the news media to get our attention, by the marketplace to get our money, or by politicians to get our votes, we are little more than fish on the end of a hook, instinctively afraid and flipping and flopping with fear at the end of a line somebody else is dangling to jerk us around…and the instinctive, subconscious nature of this risk perception system are the rod and reel they’re using, and we really can’t too much about it.

      As this essay is being written, the hit count for exFEARience on You Tube is around 150,000. It will surely rocket up…not just because the ad is brilliant…but because it’s so true.

The “new normal” paradox: What COVID-19 has revealed about higher education

Higher education faces challenges that are unlike any other industry. What path will ASU, and universities like ASU, take in a post-COVID world?

Photo: Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images
Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • Everywhere you turn, the idea that coronavirus has brought on a "new normal" is present and true. But for higher education, COVID-19 exposes a long list of pernicious old problems more than it presents new problems.
  • It was widely known, yet ignored, that digital instruction must be embraced. When combined with traditional, in-person teaching, it can enhance student learning outcomes at scale.
  • COVID-19 has forced institutions to understand that far too many higher education outcomes are determined by a student's family income, and in the context of COVID-19 this means that lower-income students, first-generation students and students of color will be disproportionately afflicted.
Keep reading Show less

Climate change melts Mount Everest's ice, exposing dead bodies of past climbers

Melting ice is turning up bodies on Mt. Everest. This isn't as shocking as you'd think.

Image source: Wikimedia commons
Surprising Science
  • Mt. Everest is the final resting place of about 200 climbers who never made it down.
  • Recent glacial melting, caused by climate change, has made many of the bodies previously hidden by ice and snow visible again.
  • While many bodies are quite visible and well known, others are renowned for being lost for decades.
Keep reading Show less

Creativity: The science behind the madness

Human brains evolved for creativity. We just have to learn how to access it.

Creativity: The science behind the madness | Rainn Wilson, David Eagleman, Scott ...
  • An all-star cast of Big Thinkers—actors Rainn Wilson and Ethan Hawke; composer Anthony Brandt; neuroscientists David Eagleman, Wendy Suzuki, and Beau Lotto; and psychologist Scott Barry Kaufman—share how they define creativity and explain how our brains uniquely evolved for the phenomenon.
  • According to Eagleman, during evolution there was an increase in space between our brain's input and output that allows information more time to percolate. We also grew a larger prefrontal cortex which "allows us to simulate what ifs, to separate ourselves from our location in space and time and think about possibilities."
  • Scott Barry Kaufman details 3 brain networks involved in creative thinking, and Wendy Suzuki busts the famous left-brain, right-brain myth.

Dinosaur bone? Meteorite? These men's wedding bands are a real break from boredom.

Manly Bands wanted to improve on mens' wedding bands. Mission accomplished.

Sex & Relationships
  • Manly Bands was founded in 2016 to provide better options and customer service in men's wedding bands.
  • Unique materials include antler, dinosaur bones, meteorite, tungsten, and whiskey barrels.
  • The company donates a portion of profits to charity every month.
Keep reading Show less
Politics & Current Affairs

How #Unity2020 plans to end the two-party system, bring back Andrew Yang

The proposal calls for the American public to draft two candidates to lead the executive branch: one from the center-left, the other from the center-right.

Scroll down to load more…