The Fat Tax? The Stupid Tax?

BIG THINKER Daniel Honan reminds us that Mayor Bloomberg is not in any obvious sense an ideologue.  He's just about using the power of government to curtail behavior that costs the governmentand so the good people of NYCmoney.


Epidemic obesity is expensive in terms of health care and lost productivity.

Eating too much sugar (sucrose and fructose) is a big cause of obesity.  But it's not the only cause.

Portions of everything in the world of comparatively fast food have ballooned. Even the average bagel is much bigger.  That's an important reason, no doubt, why consumers of fast food have ballooned too.  Most Americans who regularly consume fast food are relatively poor and uneducated.  They, someone has to add truthfully, often have to struggle to survive.  Fast food has two undeniable virtues:  It's cheap and it's fast.  Lots of calories per buck might actually be considered a good thing for members of the working poorespecially those with many mouths to feed.

So the same logic that causes the mayor to go after big sodas, it seems to me, would lead to a war against every form of supersizing servings of unrefined carbs.

There ought to be a law against pounds of pizza for ten bucks, against especially all-you-can-eat pizza buffets such as CiCi's, and against massive servings of fries.  Whoppers and other gigantic burgers can't be exempted:  The mixture of greasy meat and white buns kills far more readily than either part eaten alone.

The mayor has now expressed the explicitly paternalistic view that the poor and uneducated may just not be aware of the nutritional issues involved here.  So they need government's help.

I'd be for that help in terms of public education.  But prohibition is too promiscuous a remedy.  It affects the clinically insignificant indulgence of those who get ridiculously-sized popcorns and soda and candy during their monthly trip to the movies. What's the harm in the convenience of a serving that lasts the whole show? Or that can be shared with your kids or significant other?

And what about the godsend the various forms of cheap supersizing are to the poor who have the sense to save by splitting the pizzas or the foot-longs or whatever?

Because large portions don't necessarily lead to personal fatness, Daniel talks up the more direct and seemingly just solution of taxing the fat directly as burdens to society.

Let me just raise a couple of obvious objections.

The tax on the FAT would be regressive.  There's an increasingly close correlation between obesity and economic class.

The tax absolves the rich of any responsibility for the unfortunate.  It's a lot harder for the poor and struggling to choose not to be fat.  The tax is lacking in charity or even empathy.

The tax on the fat stems from the hyper-moralism about obesity I find among prosperous professors.  Their easy and unstressful jobs give them plenty of time to exercise. Almost every college is equipped with a gym worthy of a resort. Professors also have the time and money  to eat in good restaurants and shop and plan for healthy meals. They also think smoking marijuana is a victimless crime.

Bloomberg connects obesity more to stupidity than socioeconomic struggle.  So why not tax those who are more stupid than they need be?  These people are more unproductive and a general burden on the economy than the fat considered as a class.  Tax high-school dropouts!

There are all sorts of things government can do, beginning with public education and perhaps going on to removing subsidies for sugar and corn.  There should also be a lot more public attention to the causes of the growing economic inequality in America and to the cultural division of the country into two or more increasingly distant and irresponsible (in different ways) classes.

Heck, let me add one more:  Being ugly is also amazingly closely correlated to lack of productivity.  Ugliness is not simply a personal choice, of course.  But surely we can tax those who display TATTOOSan epidemic that disturbs me a lot more than obesity.  That Henna on GIRLS just doesn't get how self-indulgent that thing on her shoulder is.

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less

Why are so many objects in space shaped like discs?

It's one of the most consistent patterns in the unviverse. What causes it?

Videos
  • Spinning discs are everywhere – just look at our solar system, the rings of Saturn, and all the spiral galaxies in the universe.
  • Spinning discs are the result of two things: The force of gravity and a phenomenon in physics called the conservation of angular momentum.
  • Gravity brings matter together; the closer the matter gets, the more it accelerates – much like an ice skater who spins faster and faster the closer their arms get to their body. Then, this spinning cloud collapses due to up and down and diagonal collisions that cancel each other out until the only motion they have in common is the spin – and voila: A flat disc.

Scientists study tattooed corpses, find pigment in lymph nodes

It turns out, that tattoo ink can travel throughout your body and settle in lymph nodes.

17th August 1973: An American tattoo artist working on a client's shoulder. (Photo by F. Roy Kemp/BIPs/Getty Images)
popular

In the slightly macabre experiment to find out where tattoo ink travels to in the body, French and German researchers recently used synchrotron X-ray fluorescence in four "inked" human cadavers — as well as one without. The results of their 2017 study? Some of the tattoo ink apparently settled in lymph nodes.


Image from the study.

As the authors explain in the study — they hail from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, and the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment — it would have been unethical to test this on live animals since those creatures would not be able to give permission to be tattooed.

Because of the prevalence of tattoos these days, the researchers wanted to find out if the ink could be harmful in some way.

"The increasing prevalence of tattoos provoked safety concerns with respect to particle distribution and effects inside the human body," they write.

It works like this: Since lymph nodes filter lymph, which is the fluid that carries white blood cells throughout the body in an effort to fight infections that are encountered, that is where some of the ink particles collect.

Image by authors of the study.

Titanium dioxide appears to be the thing that travels. It's a white tattoo ink pigment that's mixed with other colors all the time to control shades.

The study's authors will keep working on this in the meantime.

“In future experiments we will also look into the pigment and heavy metal burden of other, more distant internal organs and tissues in order to track any possible bio-distribution of tattoo ink ingredients throughout the body. The outcome of these investigations not only will be helpful in the assessment of the health risks associated with tattooing but also in the judgment of other exposures such as, e.g., the entrance of TiO2 nanoparticles present in cosmetics at the site of damaged skin."

Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Do human beings have a magnetic sense? Biologists know other animals do. They think it helps creatures including bees, turtles and birds navigate through the world.

Keep reading Show less