Sure, the Democrats Want to Tax the Rich. (But They Also Think They're Entitled!)

Is there a kind of noble consistency in insisting the rich pay more taxes and not be entitled to government payments they don't need?

So this article calls attention to a fascinating inconsistency shared by our two parties:


1. Republicans (particularly Paul Ryan) want to cut taxes for the rich.  But they also want to means-test entiltements--such as Social Security and Medicare.  That means the rich will pay less to the IRS, but get less (or ideally nothing) from those programs--because they don't need government's help to sustain themselves.

2. The Democrats (particularly the socialist Bernie Saunders) wants to raise taxes on the rich--mainly to help pay for entitlement programs.  Bu they also think the rich, like everyone else, are fully entitled to all the benefits available from those programs.

3.  Republicans (meaning, in the extreme case, libertarians) think that taxing the rich is literally counterproductive.  The less they pay, the more incentive they have to use their talents and resources in productive ways.  The resulting prosperity benefits us all.  There's also the libertarian thought that taxing productivity is unjust; free people deserve to keep what they earn through their industrious and rational exertions.  What we have here, of course, is sometimes called SUPPLY-SIDE ECONOMICS--or, in a more unfriendly mode, TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS. 

4. Democrats tend to believe that entitlements should be thought of as something all citizens deserve--or not as charity.  "Means-testing" would undermine support for these programs in a variety of ways--but, first of all, through a misconception of what they are.

5. The Republicans, it's true enough, want to "demoralize" entitlements by viewing them as aid to the unfortunate.  Then they become something the individual should think of himself or herself as working not to need.  The ideal of "entitlement," the problem is, leads us to think we have a responsibility to provide the program to everyone, no matter what we (meaning the government) can actually afford.  Republicans don't want entitlement programs thought of as "rights," but as something, ideally, a free and prosperous society can minimize or get beyond.

6. The Democrats deny that taxing the rich is counterproductive.  The Republicans say they forget that eroding the conditions that maximize productivity guarantees the implosion of those programs we may actually need.

7. Let's conclude by wondering whether there's a certain kind of noble consistency in insisting that the rich pay more in taxes and not be entitled to government payments they don't even need.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

4 reasons Martin Luther King, Jr. fought for universal basic income

In his final years, Martin Luther King, Jr. become increasingly focused on the problem of poverty in America.

(Photo by J. Wilds/Keystone/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Despite being widely known for his leadership role in the American civil rights movement, Martin Luther King, Jr. also played a central role in organizing the Poor People's Campaign of 1968.
  • The campaign was one of the first to demand a guaranteed income for all poor families in America.
  • Today, the idea of a universal basic income is increasingly popular, and King's arguments in support of the policy still make a good case some 50 years later.
Keep reading Show less

A world map of Virgin Mary apparitions

She met mere mortals with and without the Vatican's approval.

Strange Maps
  • For centuries, the Virgin Mary has appeared to the faithful, requesting devotion and promising comfort.
  • These maps show the geography of Marian apparitions – the handful approved by the Vatican, and many others.
  • Historically, Europe is where most apparitions have been reported, but the U.S. is pretty fertile ground too.
Keep reading Show less

Why I wear my life on my skin

For Damien Echols, tattoos are part of his existential armor.

Videos
  • In prison Damien Echols was known by his number SK931, not his name, and had his hair sheared off. Stripped of his identity, the only thing he had left was his skin.
  • This is why he began tattooing things that are meaningful to him — to carry a "suit of armor" made up the images of the people and objects that have significance to him, from his friends to talismans.
  • Echols believes that all places are imbued with divinity: "If you interact with New York City as if there's an intelligence behind... then it will behave towards you the same way."
Keep reading Show less