Sure, the Democrats Want to Tax the Rich. (But They Also Think They're Entitled!)

Is there a kind of noble consistency in insisting the rich pay more taxes and not be entitled to government payments they don't need?

So this article calls attention to a fascinating inconsistency shared by our two parties:

1. Republicans (particularly Paul Ryan) want to cut taxes for the rich.  But they also want to means-test entiltements--such as Social Security and Medicare.  That means the rich will pay less to the IRS, but get less (or ideally nothing) from those programs--because they don't need government's help to sustain themselves.

2. The Democrats (particularly the socialist Bernie Saunders) wants to raise taxes on the rich--mainly to help pay for entitlement programs.  Bu they also think the rich, like everyone else, are fully entitled to all the benefits available from those programs.

3.  Republicans (meaning, in the extreme case, libertarians) think that taxing the rich is literally counterproductive.  The less they pay, the more incentive they have to use their talents and resources in productive ways.  The resulting prosperity benefits us all.  There's also the libertarian thought that taxing productivity is unjust; free people deserve to keep what they earn through their industrious and rational exertions.  What we have here, of course, is sometimes called SUPPLY-SIDE ECONOMICS--or, in a more unfriendly mode, TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS. 

4. Democrats tend to believe that entitlements should be thought of as something all citizens deserve--or not as charity.  "Means-testing" would undermine support for these programs in a variety of ways--but, first of all, through a misconception of what they are.

5. The Republicans, it's true enough, want to "demoralize" entitlements by viewing them as aid to the unfortunate.  Then they become something the individual should think of himself or herself as working not to need.  The ideal of "entitlement," the problem is, leads us to think we have a responsibility to provide the program to everyone, no matter what we (meaning the government) can actually afford.  Republicans don't want entitlement programs thought of as "rights," but as something, ideally, a free and prosperous society can minimize or get beyond.

6. The Democrats deny that taxing the rich is counterproductive.  The Republicans say they forget that eroding the conditions that maximize productivity guarantees the implosion of those programs we may actually need.

7. Let's conclude by wondering whether there's a certain kind of noble consistency in insisting that the rich pay more in taxes and not be entitled to government payments they don't even need.

Why a great education means engaging with controversy

Jonathan Zimmerman explains why teachers should invite, not censor, tough classroom debates.

Sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies
  • During times of war or national crisis in the U.S., school boards and officials are much more wary about allowing teachers and kids to say what they think.
  • If our teachers avoid controversial questions in the classroom, kids won't get the experience they need to know how to engage with difficult questions and with criticism.
  • Jonathan Zimmerman argues that controversial issues should be taught in schools as they naturally arise. Otherwise kids will learn from TV news what politics looks like – which is more often a rant than a healthy debate.
Keep reading Show less

Are these 100 people killing the planet?

Controversial map names CEOs of 100 companies producing 71 percent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions.

Image: Jordan Engel, reused via Decolonial Media License 0.1
Strange Maps
  • Just 100 companies produce 71 percent of the world's greenhouse gases.
  • This map lists their names and locations, and their CEOs.
  • The climate crisis may be too complex for these 100 people to solve, but naming and shaming them is a good start.
Keep reading Show less

SpaceX catches Falcon Heavy nosecone with net-outfitted boat

It marks another milestone in SpaceX's long-standing effort to make spaceflight cheaper.

Technology & Innovation
  • SpaceX launched Falcon Heavy into space early Tuesday morning.
  • A part of its nosecone – known as a fairing – descended back to Earth using special parachutes.
  • A net-outfitted boat in the Atlantic Ocean successfully caught the reusable fairing, likely saving the company millions of dollars.
Keep reading Show less