Should Government Get Out of the Marriage Business?

Should Government Get Out of the Marriage Business?

Conservative John Fund, writing in the National Reviewsays government should get out of the marriage business.

Expect this position to take off.

For one, I've been predicting for a decade that EVANGELICALS might combine with LIBERTARIANS to reach this conclusion.  It's the way believers won't have to fight to their death or at least their ostracism resisting a public definition of marriage that's contrary to what they really, really believe. 

Our increasingly libertarian young both don't care about gay marriage and are increasingly indifferent to the institution of marriage itself.

This position squares with what Kennedy actually says in the Court's opinion in Lawrence v. Texas about government not privileging one kind of autonomous relationship over another.

It squares with what many gay rights activists say:  Same-sex marriage will privilege one kind of gay sexual relationship over another.  It will create the expectation that the only legitimate gay relationship is a marital one.  So many gays will be more marginalized than ever.  Marriage equality ought to be relationship or sexual equality.

One argument for "marriage equality" having become a right—one that has great power—is that in our individualistic world we've detached marriage from the expectation of children and having children from the expectation of marriage.

If that's so, many of the "entitlements" connected with marriage now make little sense.  Why should one able-bodied person be "on" the insurance of another if there aren't any children that need raising?  They should both be at work!  Shouldn't entitlements be directed toward parents, married or not, toward those who, for whatever reason, are actually caring for kids (as even John Locke sort of suggests)? 

And given the pervasiveness of this disconnection of marriage and parenthood, why should adoption and similar issues be resolved in favor of those who happen to be legally married?

Many Republicans, of course, wish no longer to be saddled with what appears to be a losing political issue.  They don't want the so-called "culture war" to turn on the legal definition of marriage.  Even Rush Limbaugh has lost interest in defending "traditional marriage."

Libertarians, due, in part, to the effective leadership of Rand Paul, are coming to dominate the Republican party.  On the cultural front, they have already completely captured the Democrats.

Despite the best efforts of conservatives Robert George and the media-savvy Ryan Anderson, Americans aren't going to reach rational agreement in figuring out what marriage is.  If it's recogniton of a loving commitment and nothing more, as many say, then why should government be in that business?  After all, the real problem hasn't been government recognizing some loving commitments, but, as our Court says, government dissing other loving commitments as a result of its arbitrary selectivity.

I've shamelessly given a "lawyer's argument" here. Divide up into small groups and discuss.

Iron Age discoveries uncovered outside London, including a ‘murder’ victim

A man's skeleton, found facedown with his hands bound, was unearthed near an ancient ceremonial circle during a high speed rail excavation project.

Photo Credit: HS2
Culture & Religion
  • A skeleton representing a man who was tossed face down into a ditch nearly 2,500 years ago with his hands bound in front of his hips was dug up during an excavation outside of London.
  • The discovery was made during a high speed rail project that has been a bonanza for archaeology, as the area is home to more than 60 ancient sites along the planned route.
  • An ornate grave of a high status individual from the Roman period and an ancient ceremonial circle were also discovered during the excavations.
Keep reading Show less

Surprising new feature of human evolution discovered

Research reveals a new evolutionary feature that separates humans from other primates.

Human evolution.

Credit: Adobe Stock
Surprising Science
  • Researchers find a new feature of human evolution.
  • Humans have evolved to use less water per day than other primates.
  • The nose is one of the factors that allows humans to be water efficient.
Keep reading Show less

Skepticism: Why critical thinking makes you smarter

Being skeptical isn't just about being contrarian. It's about asking the right questions of ourselves and others to gain understanding.

  • It's not always easy to tell the difference between objective truth and what we believe to be true. Separating facts from opinions, according to skeptic Michael Shermer, theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, and others, requires research, self-reflection, and time.
  • Recognizing your own biases and those of others, avoiding echo chambers, actively seeking out opposing voices, and asking smart, testable questions are a few of the ways that skepticism can be a useful tool for learning and growth.
  • As Derren Brown points out, being "skeptical of skepticism" can also lead to interesting revelations and teach us new things about ourselves and our psychology.
Keep reading Show less
Mind & Brain

New study suggests placebo might be as powerful as psychedelics

New study suggests the placebo effect can be as powerful as microdosing LSD.