MOOCS and the Stratification of American Higher Education

So Peter Sacks, author of the excellent Generation X Goes to College, explains what's really wrong with the likely MOOCification of higher education.


Studies show that learning through MOOCS and related online delivery systems isn't worse than that through the more traditional or personal ways of teaching, at least according to allegedly reliable quantitative measures.

That "assessment" is more than enough to lead state schools and poorer private schools to embrace  such efficient and effective enough instructional technology.  Students will get the competencies and skills connected with degree completion at an affordable price. There's no particular reason why "for profit" institutions—as long as they're rigorously assessed—shouldn't get involved in this effort to get as many Americans as possible through college.  American education so disrupted will have purged itself of educationally irrelevant amenities, beginning with tenured faculty lounging about insulated from the relevant standards of productivity.

Meanwhile, the richer and more "elite" colleges won't go in this techno-direction.  They will become progressively more personal, emphasizing student "engagement," more luxurious amenities from gourmet food to health-club gyms and edifying internships and study-abroad options that could easily be mistaken for vacations, and undergraduate research.

The elite schools will get better and better and the state schools will get more standardized and commodified, more reliably mediocre.  Actually, that's an optimistic scenario.  If we check out secondary education, we can see that the elite high schools are better than ever, while most high schools are pretty much warehouses for teenagers.  Those two kinds of high schools will pretty predictably feed those two kinds of colleges.  And nobody with eyes to see trusts assessment rubrics to guarantee quality control.

So you still might say there's nothing to worry about here.  Our elite colleges have pretty meritocratic admissions policies, and they're all about "diversity."  They also have lots of financial aid.  But we can also see that our colleges are more stratified than ever when it comes to SAT and IQ.  And we can also see that our "cognitive elite" is separating itself more than ever through choice of schools and all that from the rest of society.  Those who have actually looked at the stats see that diversity at our best colleges is increasingly smart and rich black and white kids being educated together.  Meanwhile, the class divide based on money, education, and brains widens, and there's no real incentive for our best colleges to care.

It's tougher than ever for members of our sinking middle class to be able to do what it takes to get into our best colleges.  Meanwhile, we're going to be about stripping our ordinary colleges with open or semi-open admissions policy of personal features, beginning with tenured faculty, to cut costs.  That means our struggling ordinary guys aren't going to get the personal attention and possible "transformative experiences" that have historically been available on even our ordinary low-tech campuses.  Those most in need of and often deserving of personal encouragement are going to be those least likely to get it.

So Sacks is right that it should offend our meritocratic sensibilities that our elite colleges are now, more than ever, First Class.  And our MOOCified colleges might well be on their way to becoming "steerage" or more and more distant from real higher education.

Ha Jin on the wild and tragic life of China's greatest poet, Li Bai

The 8th century AD was a tough time to be a genius from a poor family in China. Poet and novelist Ha Jin on the tortured life of the legendary drunken poet Li Bai. Also: panpsychism, the value of idleness, and humanities education in America today.

Think Again Podcasts
  • "I knew in the case of Li Bai, I should follow the poems. Every masterpiece by him would be kind of a small crisis…a center for drama in his life."
  • "There are people who want a different kind of fulfillment. Society should be open to that. In the long run, you don't know—maybe those idlers can produce more for the society."
Keep reading Show less

Golden blood: the rarest blood in the world

We explore the history of blood types and how they are classified to find out what makes the Rh-null type important to science and dangerous for those who live with it.

Abid Katib/Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • Fewer than 50 people worldwide have 'golden blood' — or Rh-null.
  • Blood is considered Rh-null if it lacks all of the 61 possible antigens in the Rh system.
  • It's also very dangerous to live with this blood type, as so few people have it.
Keep reading Show less

Billionaire warlords: Why the future is medieval

The world's next superpower might just resurrect the Middle Ages.

Videos
  • Russia? China? No. The rising world superpower is the billionaire class. Our problem, says Sean McFate, is that we're still thinking in nation states.
  • Nation states have only existed for the last 300-400 years. Before that, wealthy groups – tribes, empires, aristocracies, etc – employed mercenaries to wage private wars.
  • As wealth inequality reaches combustion point, we could land back in the status quo ante of the Middle Ages. Who will our overlords be? Any or all of the 26 ultra-rich billionaires who own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest. What about Fortune 500, which is more powerful than most of the states in the world? Random billionaires, multinational corporations, and the extractive industry may buy armies and wage war on their own terms.
Keep reading Show less