Re: Will the U.S. really defend Taiwan when China overtakes it?

This is a complicated question.  The history of the United States and the vague relationship with Taiwan.  The topic you have raised here is quite interesting and deeply complex.  First, it is of great importance to note China's surge as a global superpower both economically and militarily.  However, with this in mind, it is equally important to note that as Americans we take our advanced military technology as the global norm.  This is not true.  Currently, China does not have a functional naval aircraft carrier.  Such an invention is considered common place to Americans.  With this in mind, one must look at any speculation involving the United States and another sovereign country as the United States being at an inherent advantage from a technological stand point.

 Having set a rather hodge podge group of ideas I can now address your topic at hand.  Will the U.S. defend Taiwan?  The first obstacle we must tackle in this debate is the likelihood of such defense being necessary.  It is my belief that such a likelihood does exist. China considers Taiwan to be essentially theirs.  Taiwan is an enormous point of emphasis for the Chinese government.  We have reason to believe that a confrontation between Taiwan and China is imminent. 

Here is the policy as I understand it.  The U.S. has made it clear that it will defend Taiwan.  To what extent does this defense go?  Well, it is reasonable that the U.S. will send part of its Pacific Naval Fleet to aid.  The Chinese have already recognized this threat and have made it clear that such action by the U.S. would result in China bombing the Naval ship and sinking it.

As a patriot myself, I have real troubles even debating whether or not the U.S. would retaliate.  Furthermore, China is not ignorant.  China understands the gravity of such an offensive strike on American citizens (military personnel).  Therefore, I come back to my point of China not having a functional aircraft carrier (though it is of importance to note that China is currently working on such technology).  It is of equal importance to note that China would be the offensive country in such an operation.  As the offensive country China would be in great need of its Aerial support for such a conflict.  Without aircraft support China would be greatly disadvantaged. 

 In summary, yes the United States has made it clear that it will support Taiwan.  While it may not be with a full military alliance it does mean the U.S. will send SOME support in ways of our Pacific Naval Fleet.  Since China has made it clear that such support will not be tolerated and will be treated as though the U.S. is giving full support (as we did in Vietnam).  Thus, China will sink the ship.  The U.S. will in turn retaliate and essentially become fully supportive of Taiwan.  Men sharing a common enemey (Taiwan and the U.S.).  However, having this conflict happen in the near future is highly unlikely as China will not attempt to overtake Taiwan until their technology of the aircraft carrier has been completed.  But yes the U.S., from my view, will in fact end up fully supporting Taiwan.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

Your body’s full of stuff you no longer need. Here's a list.

Evolution doesn't clean up after itself very well.

Image source: Ernst Haeckel
Surprising Science
  • An evolutionary biologist got people swapping ideas about our lingering vestigia.
  • Basically, this is the stuff that served some evolutionary purpose at some point, but now is kind of, well, extra.
  • Here are the six traits that inaugurated the fun.
Keep reading Show less
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less