Re: What is wrong with homosexuality?

"First off let me say that I am not homosexual nor do I have anything against people who are. I would like to know what problems people have with homosexuality. Why do people attack it when it does not harm them? What is wrong with being gay?"

I find nothing wrong with homosexuality whatsoever. If two people of the same sex fall in love, have sex, and/or get married, I think that is a great thing. But I also think that homosexuality raises some interesting questions about how much difference society can tolerate in a person.

In society, a lot of things are set up because we can assume that most people will want to do the same things. Most people like to sit down at a restaurant, they like to not be stabbed with sharp objects, and they like to deficate in private. Some of this consistency must result from the fact that we share a large proportion of our genes, and some of it must result from people being brought up in the same culture.

However, there is also a lot of variation. People order different meals and read different books. This is a type of variation that we charish. The world would be very boring if everyone watched the same TV shows and wore the same clothes. But how much variation are we to allow? We enjoy the fact that people wear different clothes, but we don't tolerate a person who decides to wear no clothes at all.

There is a convention that falling in love, sex, and marriage are to be between a male and a female. Some people violate this convention. Homosexuals certainly don't choose to be homosexual, just as heterosexuals don't choose to be heterosexual. Sexual preference is a physiological constraint that is forced on the individual. For this reason, I feel that homosexuality should accepted and encouraged. Homosexuality is a type of variation that does society little harm.

But if homosexuality occurs, what other types of behavioral variation can occur? What if certain people like to stand up in restaurants, stab themselves with sharp objects, and deficate in public? The problem is how much variation to allow.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

26 ultra-rich people own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest

The Oxfam report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency."

Getty Images and Wikimedia Commons
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new report by Oxfam argues that wealth inequality is causing poverty and misery around the world.
  • In the last year, the world's billionaires saw their wealth increase by 12%, while the poorest 3.8 billion people on the planet lost 11% of their wealth.
  • The report prompted Anand Giridharadas to tweet: "Don't be Pinkered into everything's-getting-better complacency." We explain what Steven Pinker's got to do with it.
Keep reading Show less

People who constantly complain are harmful to your health

Moans, groans, and gripes release stress hormones in the brain.

Photo credit: Getty Images / Stringer

Could you give up complaining for a whole month? That's the crux of this interesting piece by Jessica Hullinger over at Fast Company. Hullinger explores the reasons why humans are so predisposed to griping and why, despite these predispositions, we should all try to complain less. As for no complaining for a month, that was the goal for people enrolled in the Complaint Restraint project.

Participants sought to go the entirety of February without so much as a moan, groan, or bellyache.

Keep reading Show less
  • Facebook and Google began as companies with supposedly noble purposes.
  • Creating a more connected world and indexing the world's information: what could be better than that?
  • But pressure to return value to shareholders came at the expense of their own users.
Keep reading Show less