Re: What everybody ought to know about Baze v Rees (redux)

Interesting post. I'd like to comment on only one narrow aspect of it: the citation of Scalia's comment that the standard is 'cruel and unusual' rather than 'painless.' As you said (quire rightly, I think), 'cruel and unusual' carries some cultural connotation; it's meaning has certainly changed with time. Moreover, the words by themselves are somewhat vacuous - there isn't really much content in that concept to help the judicial system with figuring out some guidelines regarding methods of execution. But if we are going to have some guidelines (we must!), then we - well, the judicial system - must give those vacuous words some content. I am not here going to suggest an argument for one method or another (though I happen to agree that if there is a less painful method, why not use it?), I simply want to make the point that in excluding certain notions (e.g., pain), Justice Scalia has already begun to give some content to the otherwise vacuous phrase. In excluding some content, he is already committed to the idea of delineating the content of the phrase 'cruel and unusual.' If he is thus committed to the idea of delineating some content for the phrase, what does he suggest?

NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
  • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
  • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
Keep reading Show less

How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

Image: Dicken Schrader
Strange Maps
  • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
  • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
  • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Keep reading Show less

Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

Sponsored
  • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
  • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.