Re: Should religious texts be taught in schools?
In my Introduction to World Religions course I give a pretest. I simply list those covered in the text and ask students to write one statement of fact about each religion. Even about their own religion students are often mistaken and about most traditions they are entirely ignorant or have a woefully distorted impression. Surely the texts should be studied.
But not all religious traditions are textual and many which have texts are much more than their texts, so the question needs to be modified. It needs to ask whether the non-verbal texts of ritual and life practice should be studied as well.
Furthermore there needs to be clarification about the scope of teaching about religions. If "religio" means a "binding together" then not only "two-story" religions need to be examined but also religions such as communism, nationalism, capitalism and atheism need to be studied for what they are both in their texts and their practice.
Finally, our increasing diversity demands such study.
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.