Re: Should religious texts be taught in schools?
In my Introduction to World Religions course I give a pretest. I simply list those covered in the text and ask students to write one statement of fact about each religion. Even about their own religion students are often mistaken and about most traditions they are entirely ignorant or have a woefully distorted impression. Surely the texts should be studied.
But not all religious traditions are textual and many which have texts are much more than their texts, so the question needs to be modified. It needs to ask whether the non-verbal texts of ritual and life practice should be studied as well.
Furthermore there needs to be clarification about the scope of teaching about religions. If "religio" means a "binding together" then not only "two-story" religions need to be examined but also religions such as communism, nationalism, capitalism and atheism need to be studied for what they are both in their texts and their practice.
Finally, our increasing diversity demands such study.
- The meaning of the word 'confidence' seems obvious. But it's not the same as self-esteem.
- Confidence isn't just a feeling on your inside. It comes from taking action in the world.
- Join Big Think Edge today and learn how to achieve more confidence when and where it really matters.
- There are 2 different approaches to governing free speech on college campuses.
- One is a morality/order approach. The other is a bottom-up approach.
Two new studies say yes. Unfortunately, each claims a different time.
- Both studies involved mice on treadmills and measured different markers to produce their results.
- Economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett breaks down what qualities will inspire others to believe in you.
- Here's how 300 leaders and 4,000 mid-level managers described someone with executive presence.
- Get more deep insights like these to power your career forward. Join Big Think Edge.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.