Re: Re: Re: How can we balance being happy with so much suffering in the world?
Interesting. I'd be a little wary about drawing lessons from the likes of Nietszche and Darwin though. Darwin studied birds and turtles, and came up with a very important scientific advancement. However, the human mind being unfathomably complex, I think the lessons to be drawn about personal happiness and fulfillment from the general outline of long-term species evolution are nil. In my opinion, whatever your philosophic or religious outlook, there is great wisdom to be had from religion and ancient philosophers (especially Aristotle). Human happiness is certainly one of the most difficult and elusive concepts to think about. I will be honest, I think Nietsche is one of the most disastrously wrong thinkers, who has had an utterly atrocious effect on the state of the human mind. It astounds me that liberal, generally kind-hearted people can excuse so many of the despicable things he wrote. The link between him and Hitler is often disputed, but in my mind it is undeniable. Nietszche was no anti-Semite, but in terms of general outlook, Hitler did exactly what Nietszche called for. He set out to make himself a superman, stronger and wiser than everyone else (Zarathrustra anyone?). He felt no compunction or lingering Christian love of pity for mankind, only contempt for the vast majority of mankind. He crushed and persecuted the weak (something that Nietsche explicitly exhorted by praising cruelty and repeatedly disputing the inherent worth of all men). Hitler's version of Nietschism was obviously far more vulgar than the master's, but a close look at Nietsche reveals a thinker who tried to tear down all old morality, even and especially the aspects of it that called for respect for humankind and protection for the weak. That was a bit of a rant, but I suppose my main message is, Nietsche has little to say about human happiness. I agree with your point about challenging yourself, but in no way is this new to Nietsche. This idea goes back at least to the ancient Greeks, and Aristotle in particular, who located happiness in the struggle for a life of virtue. If anything, Nietsche perverted the idea into a notion of "power." If we consider history, it is instantly obvious that the powerful have not always been just (definitely an understatement). Power is certainly important, but the pursuit of it alone leads not to happiness but to a debasement and perversion of the human soul.
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Are we trying to solve too many problem with technological solutions?
- Technology has given humanity the amazing ability to fix almost any problem, conditioning us to search for technological remedies to what might be social problems.
- Alleviating social inequity is a problem that technology must necessarily attempt to solve, but technology alone cannot shape how humans assemble their societies.
- Only by emphasizing the primary place of individual identity, human dignity, and universal values like empathy and emotion, can we hope to solve global issues that, so far, technology has been unable to conquer.
Radical Transformational Leadership: Strategic Action for Change Agents
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Long hidden under trees, it's utterly massive
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.