Re: Ingrid Newkirk: Ethics Worth Fighting For
An interesting article. I think it is a bit rich for any organisation to state "we abide by the law" while at the same time saying "we can't be responsible for the actions of individuals". In the same vein Hammas is a political organisation, just because a few members take action that, I'm sure would be morally correct for them, which amounts to terrorist acts for others, I'm sure Hammas gets away with the same rhetoric as PETA.......or maybe not.
I don't have a problem with organisations having an ideology, but when they put forward an action plan for people to follow, it is just plain irresponsible to claim you are free from responsibility when people follow that action plan to its extremes.
Suggesting Zoos should be boycotted, hasn't anyone been keeping up with the captive breeding program that seeks to keep endangered species going? Humans have caused this problem, surely the morally appropriate thing to do would be to do something about it.
The example given of a dog trapped in a car, or what would you do if it was your animal are very emotive. In my experience, when people find a dog trapped in a car and it looks like it's suffering, they call the authorities who then take appropriate action. If this seems to take a bit long for some people, then they should be able to take responsibility for their actions when law enforcement turns up. With the equal opportunity legal system, the dog owner would be charged with animal cruelty offences, and the person doing the right thing may open themselves to prosecution for interfering with a motor vehicle and criminal damage. I would hope the moral animal rights enthusiast would not whinge to authorities when the law is meted out in equal measure, remembering that the final judgement is in the court, not by the roadside or in the carpark. (you can be prosecuted and still hold the moral high ground)
In some circumstances, peoples moral compass can lead to the right outcome, but when mob mentality, or a corporation with no responsibility, comes into it, the right thing can become somewhat skewed by the views and mission of the corporation.
Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.
No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.
Is it "perverseness," the "death drive," or something else?
A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.
- Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
- The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
- According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
It's up to us humans to re-humanize our world. An economy that prioritizes growth and profits over humanity has led to digital platforms that "strip the topsoil" of human behavior, whole industries, and the planet, giving less and less back. And only we can save us.
- It's an all-hands-on-deck moment in the arc of civilization.
- Everyone has a choice: Do you want to try to earn enough money to insulate yourself from the world you're creating— or do you want to make the world a place you don't have to insulate yourself from?
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.