Re: How do we know who's history is right?
Each of us, in fact, writes his own history, by cherry-picking those bits of pre-existing history cherry-picked and filtered by others, that support our world view.
From extensive study of the JFK assassination (my work is available at patspeer.com) I came to see how people investigating the case, from day one, saw Oswald either as a "patsy"--an ordinary guy put in extraordinary circumstances--or as a psychopathic loser out to make a name for himself. It's clear that those in the upper echelons of society-people who think of themselves as self-made or as "deserving" of their success, resent that a man as poor as Oswald, a Marxist, would have people believe in his innocence. To their minds, Oswald's motive is obvious: he hated himself and his failed life and thought his only chance at making a name for himself was by killing the President.
To others, including myself, this is ludicrous. Of course, Oswald MAY have wanted to kiil Kennedy for personal reasons, but nothing in his behavior indicated as much. He certainly never bragged about killing Kennedy. He even told the cops that killing Kennedy was stupid because Johnson would be no better.
Another factor determining one's view of the assassination is one's respect for expertise and authority. Those holding that Oswald did it most always defer to "experts" of one sort or an other, and attack the expertise of the nay-sayers. If you challenge the experts on some of their conclusions, and even prove these experts incompetent or deceptive (as I myself have done in the videos at patspeer.com) they will not respond to you with facts, but attack your right to question the authority and initegirty of the experts. They will do this even when you show something as simple and obvious as that a doctor testified with his exhibit upside down.
Bottom line: official history is the cumulative guesswork of those with a platform to broadcast their guesses.
Perspectives on history change not because people change their minds so much as that those of one perspective die off and are replaced by people exposed to different platforms.
- The meaning of the word 'confidence' seems obvious. But it's not the same as self-esteem.
- Confidence isn't just a feeling on your inside. It comes from taking action in the world.
- Join Big Think Edge today and learn how to achieve more confidence when and where it really matters.
- There are 2 different approaches to governing free speech on college campuses.
- One is a morality/order approach. The other is a bottom-up approach.
- Emily Chamlee-Wright says there are many benefits to having no one central authority on what is appropriate speech.
Two new studies say yes. Unfortunately, each claims a different time.
- Research at the Weizmann Institute of Sciences declares evening to be the best time for an exercise session.
- Not so fast, says a new study at UC Irvine, which replies that late morning is the optimal workout time.
- Both studies involved mice on treadmills and measured different markers to produce their results.
- Economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett breaks down what qualities will inspire others to believe in you.
- Here's how 300 leaders and 4,000 mid-level managers described someone with executive presence.
- Get more deep insights like these to power your career forward. Join Big Think Edge.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.