Michio Kaku: The Energy of the Future

"We are children when we talk about the cosmic scale of energies throughout the entire universe," says theoretical physicist Michio Kaku. But with a little (okay, a lot) of human ingenuity, we may one day have the ability to harness the energy of the stars.

 Megan Erickson
21 November, 2011

What's the Big Idea?

"We are children when we talk about the cosmic scale of energies throughout the entire universe," says theoretical physicist Michio Kaku. But with a little (okay, a lot) of human ingenuity, we may one day have the ability to harness the energy of the stars. 

Watch here:

To convey the broadness and wideness of the possibilities, Dr. Kaku points to the Kardashev Scale developed by Soviet astrophysicist Nikolai Kardashev. The scale, while purely theoretical, puts forward a basic framework for evaluating the technological advancement of any civilization from a cosmic perspective. (Kardashev, for the record, predicts that the universe will live infinitely long and with infinite variety.)

The scale starts at Type I and progresses all the way to Type III, which is about 10-100 billion times more powerful than a Type II civilization:  

  • Type I: Energizes its cities and machines with all of the energy that lands on the earth.
  • Type II: Harnesses the power of the sun. The physicist Freeman Dyson has postulated that a giant sphere could be placed around a mother star to absorb its light.
  • Type III: This is the world of Star Trek and Empire Strikes Back and Ursula Le Guin. Each star is a thermonuclear furnace, and a galactic civilization would actually use this energy to power machines cleanly and efficiently. 

    • So where does contemporary human civilization fall? Easy, says Dr. Kaku. We're type zero. Using dead plants and organisms to power machines is a comparatively archaic form of fueling our world. But there's hope: each year, the planet generates 3% more power than the one before, which puts us only about 100 years away from becoming a Type I and a 1,000 years away from being a Type II civilization. "In about 100 years time, the energy output of the earth will be comparable to the total amount of sunlight that hits the earth itself," he adds. 

    What's the Significance?

    That is the point at which reasonable hypothesizing ends and imagination begins. Beyond the Kardashev Scale, Kaku speculates, extragalactic power awaits. A "Type IV" civilization would be able to look beyond our galaxy, unlocking the potent and mysterious force of dark energy. For, while stars make up 4% of the matter of the universe, 23% of the universe is comprised of dark matter, and 73%, dark energy. 

    The modernist bard e.e. cummings once wrote, "This is the wonder that's keeping the stars apart." Reality, it turns out, may be just as lyrical as verse. "The evolution of the universe itself, we think, is driven by... dark energy," says Dr. Kaku. "This invisible energy... pulls the galaxies apart, creates the expanding universe. In the far future, perhaps when we harness extragalactic energy -  dark energy - we can [then] harness the energy of the Big Bang itself." 

    Tell us: what do you think? How will our world be powered in the future? Will we ever harness the energy of the Big Bang?

    Image courtesy of Shutterstock

    3 philosophers set up a booth on a street corner – here’s what people asked

    "I should be as happy as I'm ever going to be right now, but I'm not. Is this it?"

    Personal Growth

    The life choices that had led me to be sitting in a booth underneath a banner that read “Ask a Philosopher" – at the entrance to the New York City subway at 57th and 8th – were perhaps random but inevitable.

    Keep reading Show less
    philosophy happiness life personal growth morality

    Why radicals can't recognize when they're wrong

    It's not just ostriches who stick their head in the sand.

    Image source: Shutterstock
    Mind & Brain
    • Not only does everyone have personal experience with how difficult it can be to change people's minds, but there's also empirical research showing why this is the case.
    • A new study in Current Biology explains why some people seem to be constitutionally incapable of admitting they're wrong.
    • The study shows the underlying mechanism behind being bull-headed, and there may be some ways to get better at recognizing when you're wrong.
    Keep reading Show less
    mindfulness meditation personality mind brain psychology

    'Self is not entirely lost in dementia,' argues new review

    The assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" is wrong, say researchers.

    Photo credit: Darren Hauck / Getty Images
    Mind & Brain

    In the past when scholars have reflected on the psychological impact of dementia they have frequently referred to the loss of the "self" in dramatic and devastating terms, using language such as the "unbecoming of the self" or the "disintegration" of the self. In a new review released as a preprint at PsyArXiv, an international team of psychologists led by Muireann Irish at the University of Sydney challenge this bleak picture which they attribute to the common, but mistaken, assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" (as encapsulated by the line from Hume: "Memory alone… 'tis to be considered… as the source of personal identity").

    Keep reading Show less
    medical research medicine alzheimer's brain memory identity dementia