Re: Does the U.S. legislative branch need an overhaul?

William Thompson proposes an overhaul of the legislature which he contends is predicated upon an outmoded conception of the functioning of the human mind.

This idea presupposes that the purpose of legislature's design is to replicate the process of human thought. I would contend that the division between the "land-owning" elite in the senate and the "uncouth merchants and farmers" in the house was not meant to give representation to different aspects of human thought. That there were to be two houses at all was not inevitable. The outcome of the Constitutional Convention was due more to political compromise than to any adherence to the notion that the machinations of the government should reflect those of the human brain.

Thompson suggests that the Senate was supposed to be filled with cultured, thoughtful men while the House with rash, crude farmers and merchants and that this fact denotes the intention for the legislature to be composed of a house of reason and a house of passion and for the whole to represent the dichotomous nature of human thought. However, both houses are filled with humans. Both Senators and Representatives are capable of high reason and base desire. So the difference between the chambers was not supposed to exist only in the particular qualities of their component legislators, but in their structural design. The Senate is at a greater remove from the passion of the "rabble" because Senators are only accountable to their constituents every 6 years. The House is more passionate because it's Representatives are held accountable by the masses thrice as often.

Back to the point, the legislature was never intended to reflect the "complex dynamical systems of the brain," and therefore reforming it to do such would be to repudiate the founding generation that put into motion the greatest constitutional government ever conceived. Which I don't feel is a good idea. Additionally, I think it is chronocentrically arrogant to suppose that we have a such greater understanding of the functioning of the brain and of human thought and emotion that we might create any better a representation of it than our forefathers could.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

What’s behind our appetite for self-destruction?

Is it "perverseness," the "death drive," or something else?

Photo by Brad Neathery on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Each new year, people vow to put an end to self-destructive habits like smoking, overeating or overspending.

Keep reading Show less

Physicists puzzled by strange numbers that could explain reality

Eight-dimensional octonions may hold the clues to solve fundamental mysteries.

Surprising Science
  • Physicists discover complex numbers called octonions that work in 8 dimensions.
  • The numbers have been found linked to fundamental forces of reality.
  • Understanding octonions can lead to a new model of physics.
Keep reading Show less

Douglas Rushkoff – It’s not the technology’s fault

It's up to us humans to re-humanize our world. An economy that prioritizes growth and profits over humanity has led to digital platforms that "strip the topsoil" of human behavior, whole industries, and the planet, giving less and less back. And only we can save us.

Think Again Podcasts
  • It's an all-hands-on-deck moment in the arc of civilization.
  • Everyone has a choice: Do you want to try to earn enough money to insulate yourself from the world you're creating— or do you want to make the world a place you don't have to insulate yourself from?
Keep reading Show less