This is a tough question. Technology can certainly improve the length and quality of peoples' lives. However, the benefits are somewhat unevenly distributed. Middle class citizens in America may be benefiting from the same technology that is causing hardship and poverty for workers in a sweatshop in China.
I'm also not convinced that a permanent, unchanging state of happiness is necessarily the ultimate goal for the human condition. Do we really need to be happy every single second? Would it be so bad to just settle for peace of mind? What if hard physical labor makes you happy, like it does for long distance athletes?
Gilbert's discussion about artificial happiness also seems somewhat off the mark. There are drugs already that do that, but in most countries they are illegal.
Journaling can help you materialize your ambitions.
- Organizing your thoughts can help you plan and achieve goals that might otherwise seen unobtainable.
- One way to view your journal might be less of a narrative and more of a timeline of decisions.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.