Re: A solution to the same-sex marriage debate. response to a comment

I don't see abolishing legal marriage as such a big problem.  I mean, yes, it is going to involve a lot of work to get it done, but when has creating equality for a group of people been easy or popular?  I mean, its been over 40 years since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed and there is still discrimination and racism in this country.  Also, marriage wouldn't be prohibited and it wouldn't necessarily negate everyone who is already married.  All it would do would be that a couple would have to apply for and receive their civil union at the courthouse, and then go to church and get married, or the other way around.  I also disagree with the statement that abolishing marriage "skirts the real problem of discrimination against the gay community."  You say that civil unions for everyone is the "equaling negation of them (civil rights)"  I don't see how that is true.  If you have two of the same exact water fountains sitting next to each other and one has a sign up by it that says "Whites only" and the other has a sign up that says "Colors only", if you take the signs down, how do you know which one is better? 


The only way you can say that civil unions for everyone is some how a negative is by implying that legal marriage is in some way better than civil unions, which it wouldn't be because the only difference would be the name.  This solution does not in any way reduce the value of marriage.  It just seperates the contract of marriage, which would be a recognition by the church, and the contract of civil union, which would be a recognition by the state.  You can have one or the other, or both if you want them. 

This problem isn't going to be solved by waiting until everyone comes around and decides that being homosexual is okay.  Sometimes the right thing isn't popular.

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less
Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Do human beings have a magnetic sense? Biologists know other animals do. They think it helps creatures including bees, turtles and birds navigate through the world.

Keep reading Show less

Harvard: Men who can do 40 pushups have a 'significantly' lower risk of heart disease

Turns out pushups are more telling than treadmill tests when it comes to cardiovascular health.

Airman 1st Class Justin Baker completes another push-up during the First Sergeants' push-up a-thon June 28, 2011, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Participants were allowed 10 minutes to do as many push-ups as they could during the fundraiser. Airman Baker, a contract specialist assigned to the 354th Contracting Squadron, completed 278 push-ups. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Janine Thibault)
Surprising Science
  • Men who can perform 40 pushups in one minute are 96 percent less likely to have cardiovascular disease than those who do less than 10.
  • The Harvard study focused on over 1,100 firefighters with a median age of 39.
  • The exact results might not be applicable to men of other age groups or to women, researchers warn.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. reacts to New Zealand's gun ban

On Thursday, New Zealand moved to ban an array of semi-automatic guns and firearms components following a mass shooting that killed 50 people.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Gun control supporters are pointing to the ban as an example of swift, decisive action that the U.S. desperately needs.
  • Others note the inherent differences between the two nations, arguing that it is a good thing that it is relatively hard to pass such legislation in such a short timeframe.
  • The ban will surely shape future conversations about gun control in the U.S.
Keep reading Show less