Would Republicans Raise Taxes Under Any Circumstances?
Big Think’s Peter Lawler thought Michele Bachmann won the Republican debate last night in advance of the Iowa straw poll. Other conservative commentators thought Texas Governor Rick Perry, who will announce his candidacy tomorrow, won simply by not being one of the uninspiring candidates on stage. But whoever came out of the debate looking the best, the candidates made one thing clear: none of them would consider raising taxes.
The debate, as Ezra Klein wrote this morning, was not so much about what the right policies would be—for the most part the candidates agreed on what they would do as president—but about “which or the candidates believed in those policies the most.” It was about who was the most sincere in their conservative orthodoxy. And, as Conor Friedersdorf says, the most telling demonstration of their orthodoxy was “when the moderators asked the candidates to raise their hands if they would walk away from a deal that cut ten dollars from the deficit for every one dollar in tax increases. Every last person on stage said they'd reject that deal.”
The Democratic National Committee has already released a melodramatic web video of the episode, accusing the Republican candidates of “pledging allegiance to the Tea Party.” Big Think’s Lawler thinks the Republican candidates were right to raise their hands, on the grounds that “tax increases are never the right thing to do.” I strongly disagree. Paying taxes is painful, but we need to pay for the valuable functions of government—like defense and Medicare—somehow. Taxes are low in the U.S. both by historical standards and compared with the rest of the developed world. I think in any case that it is appropriate for the government to require citizens to contribute to the common welfare rather than depend on purely voluntary contributions. It was appropriate, for example, for the government to raise taxes in the 1940s to levy funds to fight World War II. Cutting the deficit may not be as important as fighting Hitler, but it’s certainly striking that every single Republican candidate for President confesses to believe that refusing to raise taxes is ten times more important that balancing the budget.
UPDATE: Peter Lawler explains in his latest post that I have misunderstood his position. I read him as taking the position that "tax increases are never the right thing to do," when in fact he was simply trying to summarize Michele Bachmann's view. My apologies to Peter for getting his position wrong.
Photo credit: Fibonacci Blue
Scientists have developed new ways of understanding how the biological forces of death drive important life processes.
- Researchers have found new ways on how decomposing plants and animals contribute to the life cycle.
- After a freak mass herd death of 300 reindeer, scientists were able to study a wide range of the decomposition processes.
- Promoting the necrobiome research will open up new areas of inquiry and even commerce.
What do we see from watching birds move across the country?
- A total of eight billion birds migrate across the U.S. in the fall.
- The birds who migrate to the tropics fair better than the birds who winter in the U.S.
- Conservationists can arguably use these numbers to encourage the development of better habitats in the U.S., especially if temperatures begin to vary in the south.
Explore how alcohol affects your brain, from the first sip at the bar to life-long drinking habits.
- Alcohol is the world's most popular drug and has been a part of human culture for at least 9,000 years.
- Alcohol's effects on the brain range from temporarily limiting mental activity to sustained brain damage, depending on levels consumed and frequency of use.
- Understanding how alcohol affects your brain can help you determine what drinking habits are best for you.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.