The Fight Over Plastic Bags

Plastic bags are still legal in California. San Francisco and a handful of other California cities already ban the bags, but California lawmakers rejected a bill brought by Democrats that would have prevented retail stores across the state from using plastic “single-use carryout bags” and required them to sell recycled-content paper bags for what they actually cost to make.

Supporters of the bill say that Californians use more than 19 billion single-use plastic bags a year—that would be more than 500 per person—and that, on the top of the environmental damage the bags do as litter, it costs the state more than $25 million to collect them and put them in landfills. Opponents of the bill argued that the bill would cost California 1,000 manufacturing jobs making the bags, portraying the bill as a hidden tax on grocery shopping that infringes our right to choose what kind of bags we want to carry our groceries in.

Opposition to the bill was largely backed by the Virginia-based American Chemistry Council, which reportedly spent millions lobbying the legislature to oppose the bill and running ads against it. The American Chemistry Council, which represents bag manufacturing interests like Dow and ExxonMobil, recently helped defeat an effort in Seattle to impose a 20-cent surcharge on single-use bags. It even funded a dubious study suggesting that reusable grocery bags could harbor bacteria that might make people with compromised immune systems sick

The truth is that disposable bags—whether paper or plastic—are a pretty poor way to get our groceries home. I doubt many people see it as question of personal freedom. Fellow Big Think blogger Maria Popova reports that eBay is introducing a reusable biodegradable shipping box. We will have to find a similar solution for carrying our groceries, because in the long run it makes no sense to employ people to manufacture things that waste resources and harm the environment—even if it cuts into the short-term profit margins of petroleum companies.

Related Articles

A controversial theory claims past, present, and future exist at the same time

Our experience of time may be blinding us to its true nature, say scientists.

Back to the Future.
Surprising Science
  • Time may not be passing at all, says the Block Universe Theory.
  • Time travel may be possible.
  • Your perception of time is likely relative to you and limited.
Keep reading Show less

Six disastrous encounters with the world’s most hostile uncontacted tribe

From questionable shipwrecks to outright attacks, they clearly don't want to be bothered.

Culture & Religion
  • Many have tried to contact the Sentinelese, to write about them, or otherwise.
  • But the inhabitants of the 23 square mile island in the Bay of Bengal don't want anything to do with the outside world.
  • Their numbers are unknown, but either 40 or 500 remain.
Keep reading Show less

Found: second draft of Galileo's argument for a heliocentric model

At least he wasn't burned at the stake, right?

The original letter in which Galileo argued against the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church has been rediscovered in London. Image credit: The Royal Society
Surprising Science
  • The letter suggests Galileo censored himself a bit in order to fly more under the radar. It didn't work, though.
  • The Royal Society Journal will publish the variants of the letters shortly, and scholars will begin to analyze the results.
  • The letter was in obscurity for hundreds of years in Royal Society Library in London.
Keep reading Show less