Eating 'ultra-processed' foods linked to cancer by worrying new study
Those at risk for breast cancer should pay particular attention.
The old saying is you are what you eat. We now know that’s true, in a sense. What you put into your body can indicate what types of diseases you might develop. Those who survive on ultra-processed foods such as ramen noodles, TV dinners, chicken nuggets, French fries, sugary cereals or any of the packaged foods you find at your local convenience store have a higher risk of cancer. French and Brazilian researchers drew this conclusion in a new study published in the journal BMJ.
Researchers found that just a 10% increase in ultra-processed foods led to a 12% higher risk of cancer—in particular, breast cancer. To select individuals for the study, scientists tapped 104,980 participants from a previous French study called the NutriNet-Santé cohort study. 78% of that group were women, and the median age of all participants was 42.8 years. To evaluate their diet, participants visited a lab three times every six months for two years.
Each participant was asked what they had consumed in the last 24 hours. “Dietary intakes were collected using repeated 24-hour dietary records, designed to register participants’ usual consumption for 3,300 different food items,” researchers’ wrote. They evaluated each item and how processed it was using the NOVA food classification.
Although ramen noodles isn’t a surprise, instant soups also made the list. Credit: Getty Images.
This study is particularly poignant since the global consumption of processed foods is increasing. According to several recent surveys, 25-50% of the daily calorie intake in the US, Canada, Europe, New Zealand and Brazil come from ultra-processed foods. In this study, processed foods made up an average of 19% of the total diets of participants. These findings are particularly worrisome since cancer rates worldwide are climbing. Globally, 14.1 million cancer cases were recorded in 2012. By 2035, that number is expected to rise to 24 million.
In America, around 1.7 million new cancer diagnoses are given each year, and over 609,000 deaths occur as a result of cancer. In fact, cancer is the second most common cause of death in the U.S., right behind heart disease. The good news is that 42% of cancer cases are preventable: 19% are attributed to smoking, for example, while another 18% are related to a person's diet. Processed foods, in addition to increasing one’s cancer risk, also contribute to weight gain, which can further elevate risk.
Scientists in this study adjusted for related factors such as age, sex, height, BMI, smoking, a family history of cancer, education, and physical activity. They also adjusted for the number of times a woman gave birth, hormonal or oral contraceptive use, and menopausal status. Although the study included mostly women, researchers say male participants showed the same increase in cancer from a high processed food intake.
Note that this was an observational study. As such, it cannot determine a clear cause-and-effect relationship, merely a strong correlation. Another shortcoming is that all the data was self-reported. Even so, the findings are compelling and in line with previous research. Next, these scientists will further evaluate the association between the percentage of ultra-processed foods eaten and incidence of overall cancers including breast, prostate, and bowel cancer.
Your best bet? Stick with foods as close to their natural state as possible. Credit: Getty Images.
So what constitutes a processed food? These are items that have been altered significantly from their natural state. Fresh fruits and vegetables, natural meat or fish—that has not been reconstituted—and beans, seeds, and legumes are perhaps the furthest things from it. Processed foods include those that have been changed in significant ways either chemically, biologically or physically.
Usually, ultra-processed foods bear little resemblance to the ingredients they originate from. Many health experts believe it’s the additives and preservatives, usually a long list of chemicals, that are the most dangerous aspects of these vittles. Such chemicals include artificial colors, humectants, emulsifiers, artificial sweeteners, and flavoring agents.
Besides chemical additives, these foods are usually also high in refined sugar, fat—particularly saturated fat, and salt, and low in fiber and vitamins and minerals. Those foods to particularly watch out for include sodas and sugary drinks, instant noodles and soups, fish sticks, chicken nuggets, and other reconstituted meat products, candy bars and sweets, frozen or ready-to-eat meals, sweet or savory packaged snacks, potato chips, and mass-produced, packaged breads and buns.
Researchers conclude that, “Further studies are needed to better understand the relative effect of the various dimensions of processing (nutritional composition, food additives, contact materials, and neoformed contaminants) in these associations.” The findings are also to be verified with subsequent, large-scale studies.
To hear a podcast about these findings with one of the study’s researchers, click here.
VR's coolest feature? Boosting compassion and empathy.
- Virtual reality fills us with awe and adrenaline — and the technology is only at a crude stage, explains VR filmmaker Danfung Dennis. It's capable of inspiring something much greater in us: empathy.
- With coming technological advancements in pixel display, haptics, and sound tracking, VR users will finally be able to know what it's like to really take another person's perspective. Empathy is inherent in humans (and other animal species), but just as it can be squashed, it must be practiced in order to develop.
- "This ability to improve ourselves to become a more empathetic and compassionate society is what I hope we will use this technology for," Dennis says.
We have to practice doing nothing more often.
- Constantly being busy is neurologically taxing and emotionally draining.
- In his new book, Jon Kabat-Zinn writes that you're doing a disservice to others by always being busy.
- Busyness is often an excuse for the discomfort of being alone with your own thoughts.
That's a sharp increase from the 1960s when it took the same share of scientists an average of 35 years to drop out of academia.
- The study tracked the careers of more than 100,000 scientists over 50 years.
- The results showed career lifespans are shrinking, and fewer scientists are getting credited as the lead author on scientific papers.
- Scientists are still pursuing careers in the private sector, however there are key differences between research conducted in academia and industry.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.