New Research Shows a Way Gay Couples Could Have Children Using Their Own DNA

Scientists conceptualize a potential avenue of creating an embryo with only male cells.

Remember that Arnold Schwarzenegger movie Junior where he was pregnant? Though it seemed hilarious and over-the-top at the time, scientists are actually close to making such a thing possible, sort of. Researchers at the University of Bath in the UK have opened up the possibility of an embryo using only male cells. Working with mice, they made a pseudo-embryo called a “parthenogenote.” This was an embryo created without sperm. The feat is performed by fooling an egg cell into thinking it’s been fertilized. Usually, a parthenogenote dies off after a few days. But here, scientists were able to fertilize them with a sperm cell, and inject each embryo into a female mouse.


30 healthy pups were born this way. An egg cell was used in each case. Through these experiments, researchers hypothesized that since the parthenogenote operated much like a skin cell, perhaps such a cell could be used, bypassing the egg altogether. If perfected, such a method could revolutionize fertility science, producing healthy humans without resorting to cloning, in a way that would be relatively easy and safe.

Scientists believe they have a way of creating an embryo with a skin cell serving as an egg.

Though colleagues have called the idea “speculative and fanciful,” they haven’t ruled the idea out. This would be a huge windfall for the gay community, as gay men could have children with their own genes, cutting out adoption or a surrogate. Another place where it could help is with couples where a woman’s fertility has been damaged beyond repair, say from a serious trauma, an operation where the ovaries were removed, or through cancer therapy such as chemo. Today, banking one’s eggs is an option. But outside of that there are few.

On another front, it could also help in zoology and preservation. Need to bring back a species, and only have a few males around? Collect some sperm and a few skin cells, and that creature is back in business. Lead scientist Tony Perry said that this breakthrough challenges the notion, held since the 19th century, that only an egg cell fertilized by sperm could produce mammalian offspring.

Still, this study only offers a proof-of-concept. Far more research would have to be done before we would see if this technique could actually yield healthy, human offspring. The method was said to have a 24% success rate, as it stands now. With cloning, it’s only one to two percent. So not only does it bypass the fears associated with human cloning, it might get a lot better results. The technique should also work with other kinds of cells. But more experiments will be needed to know for sure.

This could be a huge breakthrough for the gay male community. Couples could have children with only their genes.

Not all the talk surrounding this breakthrough was positive. Fertility pioneer and specialist Neeta Gerund had some misgivings. In the British newspaper The Telegraph she wrote that, although impressed with the science, she was upset about how the breakthrough was framed. The media portrayed it as a new development in the “battle of the sexes.” Instead of war, she called for unity. After all, isn’t fertility medicine about building families? She also cleverly asked who would gestate the developing embryo, if not a woman?

Though it could reignite the hope for some couples to have children, results from this breakthrough remains far off in the future, according to both Gerund and Perry. Gerund says that how such an embryo is impacted by environmental factors, such as diet and smoking, will take years to discern, alone. For a while at least, children will continue to be made the old fashion way, with a little boost from fertility science for those who need it.

To learn more about this study click here: 

Billionaire warlords: Why the future is medieval

The world's next superpower might just resurrect the Middle Ages.

Videos
  • Russia? China? No. The rising world superpower is the billionaire class. Our problem, says Sean McFate, is that we're still thinking in nation states.
  • Nation states have only existed for the last 300-400 years. Before that, wealthy groups – tribes, empires, aristocracies, etc – employed mercenaries to wage private wars.
  • As wealth inequality reaches combustion point, we could land back in the status quo ante of the Middle Ages. Who will our overlords be? Any or all of the 26 ultra-rich billionaires who own as much as the world's 3.8 billion poorest. What about Fortune 500, which is more powerful than most of the states in the world? Random billionaires, multinational corporations, and the extractive industry may buy armies and wage war on their own terms.
Keep reading Show less

Golden blood: the rarest blood in the world

We explore the history of blood types and how they are classified to find out what makes the Rh-null type important to science and dangerous for those who live with it.

Abid Katib/Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • Fewer than 50 people worldwide have 'golden blood' — or Rh-null.
  • Blood is considered Rh-null if it lacks all of the 61 possible antigens in the Rh system.
  • It's also very dangerous to live with this blood type, as so few people have it.
Keep reading Show less

5 of the worst keto diet side effects

The keto diet can help with weight loss, but at what cost?

Pixabay
Surprising Science
  • In addition to weight loss, there are a few well-known side effects of the keto diet, some of which can be unpleasant.
  • Some side effects of the keto diet are bound to occur, though others only happen when the diet is implemented poorly.
  • The keto diet doesn't have to lead to a host of negative side effects, but anyone considering undertaking the diet over the long term should be especially careful.
Keep reading Show less