Attractive People Are Discriminated Against in This One Area of the Workforce

The reason why illuminates a certain bias we all seem to have.

Women working in an office.
Credit: Getty Images.

There are lots of places in life where the physically attractive get an unfair advantage. They’re perceived as more intelligent, more capable, and happier. They’re even more likely to get elected to a leadership position. The attractive also get more dates, are judged less harshly, and are more easily forgiven.

In the workplace, the positive stereotype is even more prominent. Good-looking people get hired over average looking peers, get paid more, and advance faster. Now, a new psychological study finds they may actually be discriminated against in one specific, yet crucial area of the work sphere, when they seek out low-level positions. Researchers at the London Business School in the UK unearthed this peculiar finding. Their conclusions were published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Attractive people going for low-level, low paying, or entry-level positions find it difficult to get hired, because hiring managers want to put someone in that’ll be satisfied with the job, long-term. A good-looking candidate is seen as too high-maintenance. They’re thought to have a sense of entitlement which will dissolve job satisfaction after the nuance of the position wears off, meaning the company will need to hire for that same position again, sooner rather than later.

We assume that the attractive expect to climb the ladder faster. Credit: Getty Images.

To test their hypothesis, researchers led by doctoral candidate Margaret Lee, put over 750 participants through several simulations. Many of the volunteers were selected for having real world managerial experience. The first leg included 148 subjects. Here, they were shown two photos, each of a person either considered traditionally attractive or unattractive. Researchers told volunteers one of the two people wasn’t happy in their current position. Participants had to guess who.

In the second phase, around 200 participants were again shown two photos. They were asked which person would be happy with the nebulous title, "Team Member in the Business Operations Department." In the last phase, human resource managers were used put into a realistic simulation, where they had to evaluate candidates as if they were hiring for a certain position. Surprisingly, the manager’s own level of attractiveness didn’t play into the decision-making process.

If you’re good-looking, you may not get that customer service job. Credit: Getty Images.

Lee and colleagues showed the hiring managers the same photographs and were told these were candidates for a certain position. Participants had to say whether or not each candidate was a good fit. Some were significant roles like a management position or a highly sought after internship. Others were less prestigious, such as a position in housekeeping, customer service, or in the warehouse.

The HR managers were asked whether each candidate depicted in the photos would be happy in a certain position, if they appeared to have a sense of entitlement, and if they thought the candidate would be hired. Even hiring managers held a negative bias for the attractive, when it came to entry-level or low-level positions. Study co-author Madan Pillutla, Ph.D. said, "The most interesting part of our findings is that decision-makers take into consideration others' assumed aspirations in their decisions."

This plays on an internal bias we all have, that those who are more attractive are somehow more worthy of better pay or more respect. But being good looking can cause you to suffer a negative bias when it comes to getting your foot in the door. Sooner or later, everyone has to go for an entry-level position. The thing about this study is, it bucks all previous ones who showed that the attractive are more easily hired across the board.

To learn more about biases surrounding the more visually pleasing, click here:

Credit: fergregory via Adobe Stock
Surprising Science
  • Australian scientists found that bodies kept moving for 17 months after being pronounced dead.
  • Researchers used photography capture technology in 30-minute intervals every day to capture the movement.
  • This study could help better identify time of death.
Keep reading Show less
Credit: Willrow Hood / 362693204 via Adobe Stock

The distances between the stars are so vast that they can make your brain melt. Take for example the Voyager 1 probe, which has been traveling at 35,000 miles per hour for more than 40 years and was the first human object to cross into interstellar space. That sounds wonderful except, at its current speed, it will still take another 40,000 years to cross the typical distance between stars.

Worse still, if you are thinking about interstellar travel, nature provides a hard limit on acceleration and speed. As Einstein showed, it's impossible to accelerate any massive object beyond the speed of light. Since the galaxy is more than 100,000 light-years across, if you are traveling at less than light speed, then most interstellar distances would take more than a human lifetime to cross. If the known laws of physics hold, then it seems a galaxy-spanning human civilization is impossible.

Unless of course you can build a warp drive.

Keep reading Show less

Just when the Middle Ages couldn’t get worse, everyone had bunions

The Black Death wasn't the only plague in the 1300s.

By Loyset Liédet - Public Domain, wikimedia commons
Culture & Religion
  • In a unique study, researchers have determined how many people in medieval England had bunions
  • A fashion trend towards pointed toe shoes made the affliction common.
  • Even monks got in on the trend, much to their discomfort later in life.
Keep reading Show less