Apple's iPhone X Runs on the Highest Density Computer Ever Built
One option was presented as the “future of how we’ll unlock our smartphones.”
To raucous catcalls and applause, Apple released its iPhone 8, iPhone X and the Apple Watch Series 3 from the New Steve Jobs Theater. Here are some of the products' best features.
The iWatch Series 3 has a built-in phone, along with “40 million songs right from your wrist.”
The Apple TV 4K will feature high dynamic range (HDR) and will deliver a crisp, cinematic quality to everything you watch. For gamers, it delivers graphics that are four times faster.
The iPhone 8 will feature a glass front and back, higher quality video and still camera, plus 3D apps and games—and it even allows for gaming in augmented reality (AR). The device will also improve the gaming experience using spacial audio. How does it work? Well, the closer you get to something in the game making noise, the louder the sound. If you say duck behind an obstacle, the sound becomes muted. It also has wireless charging and an improved photo lighting effect, which helps one take better pictures in dim lighting.
The most anticipated item by far was the iPhone X (ten). A decade ago, Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone and changed the landscape of technology and design for a decade. Today, CEO Tim Cook is hoping to solidify the company’s legacy for at least another ten years. He called the product the “Biggest leap forward since the original iPhone.”
The iPhone X. Apple.
For one thing, the home button is gone. It’s all screen. The display runs the entire length from top to bottom, edge to edge. It’s made of super strong glass on the front and the back and takes advantage of wireless charging. Apple says its dual-core A11 bionic neural engine (computer chip) is the highest density computer ever, completing 600 billion processes per second.
Most impressive by far is the phone’s facial recognition system, which they’re calling Face ID. To unlock your phone, you merely look at it and it recognizes you. Then you swipe up to go about your business. Apple executive Phil Schiller called it “The future of how we’ll unlock our smartphones.”
So how does it work? It uses 30,000 invisible dots to read your face. This is run through a "neural engine"—a set of specific, machine-learning algorithms. It works by making a mathematical model of your face to compare to the real McCoy. What if you're wearing a hat? Or change your hair? Grow a beard or put on glasses? Naturally the software is designed to adjust. And you’ll be able to use it to clear a tab with Apple Pay, and use it with other 3rd party apps like E-Trade.
Apple used facial recognition to unlock the new iPhone X. Apple.
Touch ID, which uses your fingerprint to unlock the phone, has a risk of one in 50,000 that a person could unlock your iPhone with their fingerprint. With Face ID, it’s one in a million. If the person is your twin though, be sure and use a passcode.
Another big innovation is what Apple’s calling the next generation of emojis, called anamojis. These are basically animated emojis. You can put different masks on your face, or have your face turned into different cartoon animals. You simply take a selfie and play with it in the app. It can be accessed right in messaging. You can even record a short video of your character and send it to a friend or loved one. Some character options are a fox, chicken, pig, cat, puppy, raccoon, panda, and even that swirly looking poop face that’s popular these days.
In addition, the iPhone X carries the highest quality video camera ever put into a smart phone. The camera itself has a special portrait option that evaluates the situation on actual photographic principles in real time, allowing you to take the best photo possible, right then and there. It has a lighting option too, where you can change the lighting in so many different ways. These aren’t filters but actual changes made right to the image itself. All this, and a couple more hours of battery life to boot. It comes in space gray or silver. Pre-ordering starts Friday, Oct. 27. It’ll be available for purchase online and in stores Nov. 3.
To see more, click here:
It's just the current cycle that involves opiates, but methamphetamine, cocaine, and others have caused the trajectory of overdoses to head the same direction
- It appears that overdoses are increasing exponentially, no matter the drug itself
- If the study bears out, it means that even reducing opiates will not slow the trajectory.
- The causes of these trends remain obscure, but near the end of the write-up about the study, a hint might be apparent
Through computationally intensive computer simulations, researchers have discovered that "nuclear pasta," found in the crusts of neutron stars, is the strongest material in the universe.
- The strongest material in the universe may be the whimsically named "nuclear pasta."
- You can find this substance in the crust of neutron stars.
- This amazing material is super-dense, and is 10 billion times harder to break than steel.
Superman is known as the "Man of Steel" for his strength and indestructibility. But the discovery of a new material that's 10 billion times harder to break than steel begs the question—is it time for a new superhero known as "Nuclear Pasta"? That's the name of the substance that a team of researchers thinks is the strongest known material in the universe.
Unlike humans, when stars reach a certain age, they do not just wither and die, but they explode, collapsing into a mass of neurons. The resulting space entity, known as a neutron star, is incredibly dense. So much so that previous research showed that the surface of a such a star would feature amazingly strong material. The new research, which involved the largest-ever computer simulations of a neutron star's crust, proposes that "nuclear pasta," the material just under the surface, is actually stronger.
The competition between forces from protons and neutrons inside a neutron star create super-dense shapes that look like long cylinders or flat planes, referred to as "spaghetti" and "lasagna," respectively. That's also where we get the overall name of nuclear pasta.
Caplan & Horowitz/arXiv
Diagrams illustrating the different types of so-called nuclear pasta.
The researchers' computer simulations needed 2 million hours of processor time before completion, which would be, according to a press release from McGill University, "the equivalent of 250 years on a laptop with a single good GPU." Fortunately, the researchers had access to a supercomputer, although it still took a couple of years. The scientists' simulations consisted of stretching and deforming the nuclear pasta to see how it behaved and what it would take to break it.
While they were able to discover just how strong nuclear pasta seems to be, no one is holding their breath that we'll be sending out missions to mine this substance any time soon. Instead, the discovery has other significant applications.
One of the study's co-authors, Matthew Caplan, a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University, said the neutron stars would be "a hundred trillion times denser than anything on earth." Understanding what's inside them would be valuable for astronomers because now only the outer layer of such starts can be observed.
"A lot of interesting physics is going on here under extreme conditions and so understanding the physical properties of a neutron star is a way for scientists to test their theories and models," Caplan added. "With this result, many problems need to be revisited. How large a mountain can you build on a neutron star before the crust breaks and it collapses? What will it look like? And most importantly, how can astronomers observe it?"
Another possibility worth studying is that, due to its instability, nuclear pasta might generate gravitational waves. It may be possible to observe them at some point here on Earth by utilizing very sensitive equipment.
The team of scientists also included A. S. Schneider from California Institute of Technology and C. J. Horowitz from Indiana University.
Check out the study "The elasticity of nuclear pasta," published in Physical Review Letters.
Scientists think constructing a miles-long wall along an ice shelf in Antarctica could help protect the world's largest glacier from melting.
- Rising ocean levels are a serious threat to coastal regions around the globe.
- Scientists have proposed large-scale geoengineering projects that would prevent ice shelves from melting.
- The most successful solution proposed would be a miles-long, incredibly tall underwater wall at the edge of the ice shelves.
The world's oceans will rise significantly over the next century if the massive ice shelves connected to Antarctica begin to fail as a result of global warming.
To prevent or hold off such a catastrophe, a team of scientists recently proposed a radical plan: build underwater walls that would either support the ice or protect it from warm waters.
In a paper published in The Cryosphere, Michael Wolovick and John Moore from Princeton and the Beijing Normal University, respectively, outlined several "targeted geoengineering" solutions that could help prevent the melting of western Antarctica's Florida-sized Thwaites Glacier, whose melting waters are projected to be the largest source of sea-level rise in the foreseeable future.
An "unthinkable" engineering project
"If [glacial geoengineering] works there then we would expect it to work on less challenging glaciers as well," the authors wrote in the study.
One approach involves using sand or gravel to build artificial mounds on the seafloor that would help support the glacier and hopefully allow it to regrow. In another strategy, an underwater wall would be built to prevent warm waters from eating away at the glacier's base.
The most effective design, according to the team's computer simulations, would be a miles-long and very tall wall, or "artificial sill," that serves as a "continuous barrier" across the length of the glacier, providing it both physical support and protection from warm waters. Although the study authors suggested this option is currently beyond any engineering feat humans have attempted, it was shown to be the most effective solution in preventing the glacier from collapsing.
Source: Wolovick et al.
An example of the proposed geoengineering project. By blocking off the warm water that would otherwise eat away at the glacier's base, further sea level rise might be preventable.
But other, more feasible options could also be effective. For example, building a smaller wall that blocks about 50% of warm water from reaching the glacier would have about a 70% chance of preventing a runaway collapse, while constructing a series of isolated, 1,000-foot-tall columns on the seafloor as supports had about a 30% chance of success.
Still, the authors note that the frigid waters of the Antarctica present unprecedently challenging conditions for such an ambitious geoengineering project. They were also sure to caution that their encouraging results shouldn't be seen as reasons to neglect other measures that would cut global emissions or otherwise combat climate change.
"There are dishonest elements of society that will try to use our research to argue against the necessity of emissions' reductions. Our research does not in any way support that interpretation," they wrote.
"The more carbon we emit, the less likely it becomes that the ice sheets will survive in the long term at anything close to their present volume."
A 2015 report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine illustrates the potentially devastating effects of ice-shelf melting in western Antarctica.
"As the oceans and atmosphere warm, melting of ice shelves in key areas around the edges of the Antarctic ice sheet could trigger a runaway collapse process known as Marine Ice Sheet Instability. If this were to occur, the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) could potentially contribute 2 to 4 meters (6.5 to 13 feet) of global sea level rise within just a few centuries."
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.