Could an updated Feynman experiment finally lead to a Theory of Everything?

Measuring quantum gravity has proven extremely challenging, stymying some of the greatest minds in physics for generations.

For over a century, the two leading theories in physics have had irreconcilable differences, and scientists have scrambled to find ways to square them, to no avail. An experiment proposed in 1957 by American luminary Richard Feynman, is now getting a makeover, and the results could be significant.


Scientists at Oxford University and University College London (UCL), are attempting to overhaul one of the late Nobel Laureate's experiments and in doing so, hope to heal the rift in a dramatic fashion. Could a Theory of Everything be near? This would be incorporating all four physical forces: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces, into one solid working theory.

Thus far, theoretical physicist Steven Weinberg, himself a Nobel Laureate, has only been able to combine electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force. A final theory—as Weinberg calls it, would mark the end of physics as we know it. Although the laws of general relativity and quantum mechanics work exceptionally well in their own spheres, some of the rules that govern one area don’t work in the other, and vice-versa. For instance, Relativity explains the gravitational force as it relates to bodies on Earth or in space. But it falls apart on the quantum level.

The merging of two neutron stars. Einstein’s general relativity helps us understand the gravitational forces involved well. Where it gets lost is on the quantum level. Credit: European Space Agency (ESA).

The current upgrade to Feynman’s proposal focuses on quantum gravity. Two papers on the upcoming experiment were published in the journal Physical Review Letters. In the first researchers write, “Understanding gravity in the framework of quantum mechanics is one of the great challenges in modern physics.” A lot of experiments have been proposed, but it’s proven extremely difficult to test quantum gravity in the lab.

One of the reasons, researchers write in the second paper, “Quantum effects in the gravitational field are exceptionally small, unlike those in the electromagnetic field.” Sougato Bose leads the UCL team. He told Physics World, “For example, even the electrostatic force between two electrons overtakes the gravitational force between two kilogram masses by several orders of magnitude.”

These physicists believe if they can detect gravity on the quantum level, it would help us better understand why it operates so differently there, and perhaps reveal the secret to navigating between our two prevailing theories. Feynman’s idea to test for quantum gravity surrounds something known as superposition. A particle is thought to exist in all possible states or positions at once, until measured. Then you can nail down its exact location (or velocity, but not both).

Feynman speculated that using quantum entanglement, one could take a small mass and place it inside a gravitational field, causing it to become entangled with the field on the quantum level. Then, the physicist would be able to detect the field’s interference, before indicating the mass’s position. The interference itself would cause the mass to take a single, specific location or form, which would occur before the mass separated itself from the field. And so in this way, quantum gravity could be detected.

Illustration of a quantum gravity photon race. The purple or high energy photon carries a million times the energy of the yellow one. Yet, it’s thought to move slower as it interacts more with the frothy material of space. In 2009, satellites measured a gamma ray burst from a neutron star collision. Curiously, after traveling approximately 7 billion light years, a pair of such photons arrived just nine-tenths of a second apart. Credit: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Oxford researchers Chiara Marletto and Vlatko Vedral worry that since entanglement isn’t measured directly in Feynman’s proposed experiment, it wouldn’t provide direct evidence of quantum gravity. By quantizing not one but two masses and entangling them, the Oxford physicists say, quantum gravity can be detected directly. Each mass would be in superposition and entangled in a quantum gravity field. UCL physicists added their own element, a “quantum gravity mediator,” to entangle the masses.

To conduct the experiment, two identical interferometers will be placed adjacent to one another. These usually split light up into its constituent parts. But down on the quantum level, these devices interfere with a mass’s quantum wave function, in order to superimpose its quantum state. If gravity is operating on the quantum level, the two masses will become entangled before each leaves its own interferometer.

An artist’s depiction of quantum entanglement. Credit: The National Science Foundation.

Dr. Marletto explained in Physics World,

Our two teams took slightly different approaches to the proposal. Vedral and I provided a general proof of the fact that any system that can mediate entanglement between two quantum systems must itself be quantum. On the other hand, Bose and his team discussed the details of a specific experiment, using two spin states to create the spatial superposition of the masses.

This isn’t a done deal by any means. Electromagnetic forces might interfere with the entanglement before researchers are able to measure the effects of quantum gravity. Even if the gravitational field is quantized, quantum gravity may be harder to detect than scientists predict. But if it does work, it could lead to quite a breakthrough.

There are a lot of theories on how gravity operates on the quantum level. It may originate from particles called gravitons, which would be carriers of gravity much like how photons carry electromagnetism. Quantum gravity and string theory have their own bends. The results of this experiment could help us sort quantum gravity out, and perhaps lead to a final theory, at which time, it’d be the dawning of a whole new understanding of the universe and how all its forces fit together.

To learn more about where we’re at with the Theory of Everything, click here:

3D printing might save your life one day. It's transforming medicine and health care.

What can 3D printing do for medicine? The "sky is the limit," says Northwell Health researcher Dr. Todd Goldstein.

Northwell Health
Sponsored by Northwell Health
  • Medical professionals are currently using 3D printers to create prosthetics and patient-specific organ models that doctors can use to prepare for surgery.
  • Eventually, scientists hope to print patient-specific organs that can be transplanted safely into the human body.
  • Northwell Health, New York State's largest health care provider, is pioneering 3D printing in medicine in three key ways.
Keep reading Show less

Hyperdimensional computing discovered to help AI robots create memories

New computing theory allows artificial intelligences to store memories.

Credit: Perception and Robotics Group, University of Maryland.
Technology & Innovation
  • To become autonomous, robots need to perceive the world around them and move at the same time.
  • Researchers create a theory of hyperdimensional computing to help store robot movement in high-dimensional vectors.
  • This improvement in perception will allow artificial intelligences to create memories.
Keep reading Show less

10 new things we’ve learned about death

If you don't want to know anything about your death, consider this your spoiler warning.

Culture & Religion
  • For centuries cultures have personified death to give this terrifying mystery a familiar face.
  • Modern science has demystified death by divulging its biological processes, yet many questions remain.
  • Studying death is not meant to be a morbid reminder of a cruel fate, but a way to improve the lives of the living.
Keep reading Show less

Why inequality is a ticking time bomb – for poor and rich

Riots may ensue as more poor Americans recognize their "miserable" long-term prospects.

Videos
  • How bad is wealth inequality in the United States? About 1 percent of Americans hold 80 percent of the money.
  • In the United States, the correlation between the income of parents and the income of their children when they grow up is higher than in any other country in the world.
  • One of the big underlying reasons for poverty is receiving a crummy education, which in turn leads to crummy jobs. When people recognize their miserable long-term prospects, they are more likely to partake in riots.