Why Can't the United States Have an Atheist President?

A number of prominent world leaders are avowed atheists and there's no reason the American President has to be religious.

The WikiLeaks publication of emails by the Democratic National Committee revealed that one DNC staffer floated the idea of using Bernie Sanders’s possible atheism against him. While Bernie is officially Jewish, there are reports that he is actually closer to an atheist than a practicing Jew. Bernie himself has denied this accusation. This news begs the question - why is it a kiss of political death to be labeled an “atheist”?


Certainly one wonders what it is about being an atheist that can preclude a person from becoming a US president. The argument is likely cultural. As the majority of the country believes in a God, an atheist would not accurately represent the kind of people who live in the country.

On the other hand, it’s hard to understand what specific Judeo-Christian beliefs Bernie supposedly lacks that should prevent him from being a President. Is it the belief that the heavens and the Earth were created in 6 days? Is it not agreeing with the useful strategic precedent that the seas could be magically parted when you are trying to escape a hostile army? Or maybe it all boils down to not believing that divine commandments should form the basis of our laws (especially as given to a person not proven to have ever existed)?  

A country whose bedrock constitutional principle is the separation of church and state should not have religion as a consideration when choosing its leader.

In fact, it’s easier to make an argument that not being bogged down by subjective, unprovable beliefs should make you a stronger champion of every kind of person.

Considering this, one wonders - are there leaders around the world who are atheist?

As the hack that brought these emails to life seems to have originated in Russia, one of the historical bastions of modern atheism, it's curious to consider - is Putin an atheist?

It appears he used to be one, but after several life-changing events like his ex-wife’s terrible car accident, he is now a devout member of the Russian Orthodox Church.

But there are European leaders who are without religion.

François Hollande, the President of France, is an avowed atheist, losing his religion after being raised Catholic. "I have reached a point where what is clear to me is the conviction that God doesn't exist, rather than the contrary," he said to a French magazine in 2002. This point of view works in a country that’s about 50% non-religious or atheist.

French President François Hollande speaks during the Commemoration of the Centenary of the Battle of the Somme at the Commonwealth War Graves Commission Thiepval Memorial on July 1, 2016 in Thiepval, France.  (Photo by Steve Parsons - Pool/Getty Images)

Alexis Tsipras, the prime minister of Greece, is also a strong atheist. He insisted on taking a civil oath of office, breaking with tradition.

Pope Francis poses with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras as he arrives on the Greek island of Lesbos on April 16, 2016 in Myteline, Lesbos, Greece. (Photo by Milos Bicanski/Getty Images)

Other noted leaders include the Croatian prime minister Zoran Milanović, whose country is actually 90% Catholic, and Miloš Zeman, the President of Czech Republic, probably Europe’s least religious country, where only 16% of the population identify with a faith.

Of course, Xi Jinping, the President of China, the most populous nation on Earth, is not only an atheist, but has advocated for his compatriots to be “unyielding Marxist atheists” to combat the spread of foreign religions. 

Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) shakes hands with Czech President Milos Zeman (L) at The Great Hall Of The People on September 4, 2015 in Beijing, China. (Photo by Lintao Zhang/Getty Images)

Julia Gillard, Australia’s former prime minister, is atheist, as have been 11 of 12 of the country’s prime ministers that preceded her. John Key, New Zealand’s prime minister, and Elio Di Rupo, Belgium’s former prime minister, also do not believe in a higher power.

There’s little evidence that being religious is going to somehow help the leader of the free world, the American President, to do his or her job any better. It’s time to not have this be an important qualification for the job.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.