Why Ancient Roman concrete lasts for millennia but ours crumbles in decades

Scientists solve the mystery of why 2000-year-old Roman concrete still stands strong.

Drilling in an ancient Roman structure.
Drilling at a marine structure in Portus Cosanus, Tuscany, 2003. Photo credit: J. P. Oleson.

Scientists resolved the mystery of why coastal structures built by ancient Romans 2,000 years ago are still standing. The concrete used by Roman builders in piers and harbors was made in such a way that it grew even stronger over time. Modern concrete, by comparison, tends to decay in just decades when exposed to saltwater. These findings could have an important role to play as many communities worldwide brace for rising sea levels.


Romans created concrete by mixing volcanic ash, quicklime and chunks of volcanic rock. Even though they figured out the ingredients, scientists still didn’t know the recipe. How did the Romans manage to make the concrete so long-lasting? The key turned out to be in the chemical reaction caused by the addition of seawater.

 

mary-beard-on-sexual-practices-of-ancient-romans

The Roman concrete was made to interact with its environment, as opposed to modern concrete which stays inert and gets damaged over time. Seawater is the reason why the mixture gets stronger. As seawater reacts with volcanic material, new minerals are created that reinforce the concrete.

Researchers, led by University of Utah geologist Marie Jackson, looked at the microscopic structures of Roman concrete samples by subjecting them to numerous spectroscopic tests and imaging techniques. The tests showed a rare reaction took place that spurred the growth of aluminous tobermorite crystals. Further geology detective work proved that the crystals were formed when seawater percolated through the little cracks in the Roman concrete, reacting to the mineral phillipsite, found in volcanic rock.

Jackson expressed her admiration for the genius of the Romans - 

“They spent a tremendous amount of work [on developing] this – they were very, very intelligent people,” said Marie Jackson.

Structures like the Pantheon and Trajan’s Markets in Rome were also built with this kind of concrete.

Roman author Pliny the Elder, who wrote the ancient world’s famous science tract “Natural History” once praised Roman concrete, writing “that as soon as it comes into contact with the waves of the sea and is submerged becomes a single stone mass, impregnable to the waves." 

Indeed, that’s proven to be true. Jackson is now working on recreating Roman concrete using seawater in San Francisco. This work might prove useful in building longer-lasting and stronger sea walls - a fact of growing importance. A study by European scientists predicts the costs of new coastal reinforcements will reach as high as $71 billion per year during the 21st century. Without them, coastal flooding will lead to trillions of dollars in damages.

Check out this video from the University of Utah on how seawater strengthens Roman concrete:

Read the study in American Mineralogist.

Every 27.5 million years, the Earth’s heart beats catastrophically

Geologists discover a rhythm to major geologic events.

Credit: desertsolitaire/Adobe Stock
Surprising Science
  • It appears that Earth has a geologic "pulse," with clusters of major events occurring every 27.5 million years.
  • Working with the most accurate dating methods available, the authors of the study constructed a new history of the last 260 million years.
  • Exactly why these cycles occur remains unknown, but there are some interesting theories.
Keep reading Show less

Making memories actually involves breaking our DNA, study shows

Brain cells snap strands of DNA in many more places and cell types than researchers previously thought.

Mind & Brain

The urgency to remember a dangerous experience requires the brain to make a series of potentially dangerous moves: Neurons and other brain cells snap open their DNA in numerous locations — more than previously realized, according to a new study — to provide quick access to genetic instructions for the mechanisms of memory storage.

Keep reading Show less

Babble hypothesis shows key factor to becoming a leader

Research shows that those who spend more time speaking tend to emerge as the leaders of groups, regardless of their intelligence.

Man speaking in front of a group.

Credit: Adobe Stock / saksit.
Surprising Science
  • A new study proposes the "babble hypothesis" of becoming a group leader.
  • Researchers show that intelligence is not the most important factor in leadership.
  • Those who talk the most tend to emerge as group leaders.
Keep reading Show less
Quantcast