Study: Taking Risks May Be Helping Teens Learn Better

A new study links reward-seeking to learning in teen brains.

Teens are not known to always make the best choices. They are ruled by the insecurities and passions of adolescence. They generally do not plan much for the future, instead living in the moment. But their behaviors, which may often be upsetting to their parents, might have a serious biological purpose, according to scientists. Opting for quick rewards and excitements, while taking unnecessary risks, might be a way for their brains to learn.

A new study published in the journal “Neuron” utilized an fMRI scanner to examine the brain activity of a group of 41 teens and 31 adults. Their focus was on the striatum, a part of the brain shown to be very active in teens seeking rewards or pleasures, as well as learning from such experiences. They also studied the activity in the hippocampus, the brain structure associated with memory. 

The researchers had their subjects play a guessing game, which rewarded players for correct answers. Teens who wanted rewards beat the game faster than adults. Interestingly, striatum activity was similar in both adults and teens during the game. What was different is the role of the hippocampus in the teens. 

"In neuroscience, we tend to think that if healthy brains act in a certain way, there should be a reason for it," explains Juliet Davidow, lead author of the study and postdoctoral researcher at Harvard University  in the Affective Neuroscience and Development Lab.

The role of the hippocampus was further evidenced by another test, where subjects performed a memory test to recall random flashing pictures that flashed on their screens during the game. 

If the picture was linked to getting the right answer, teens were more likely to remember it than adults, showing that their episodic memory was engaged during reward-seeking.

"If you’re someone who focuses on learning and memory, like we do in my lab, then you don’t think of reward-seeking as necessarily a bad thing. You think of rewards as something that shapes — and can have a really important role in shaping — learning," said Daphna Shohamy, a cognitive neuroscientist from Columbia University, who was also involved in the study.

Next for the scientists is figuring out whether the hippocampus and striatum work together in other age groups.

You can read the study here.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.