(one of the many) Weak Atheist Arguments
There are so many numerous weak philosophical atheist arguments its hard to pinpoint just one to bash on, but this one just has to be by far the worse. The idea that history has pushed Christ through because of its keeping the masses subverted ideas. Why is this a ridiculous idea? As atheists like to point out didn't Jesus say that our next life is our treasure? Didn't the Holy word lay a claim for servants to honor their masters? Didn't it deny this existence importance? Yes atheists it did, but follow with me here: ALL Christians are supposed to follow Christ lead in leadership. Meaning, we call a man God who, willingly, went to the cross to die for our sins. With that he left us with the responsibility to Love others like he Loved us. Now whether or not you want to believe what we know is true; Objectively, can't you see what a weak argument: "Christianity is what is best for subverting the masses" is? Because our LEADERS are charged, by Jesus example, to be subservient to the masses in a leadership role. Yes, you might be wise to point out that this example and charge Christ gave us isn’t how it has often been. This fact you could point out though tends to be more true because of the human nature aspect of absolute power corrupts absolutely vs. the Jesus example makes it easier to control the masses. However, the point remains the words of Christ are to Love all of humanity the way he loved all of humanity. Meaning, even if you are God you are to die (or simply put: do anything) for those considered below you. It would be much easier for leader’s to adopt a Hinduism religion that focuses on reincarnation and creates a religiosity of different classes if their goals were to subvert the masses. This Hinduism idea would be the religion any leader who wanted to subvert the masses would push and yet Christ words remain. Good luck tadpoles with your view that this life is all there is. I pray for your sakes your right because you do, mostly, seem like genuinely nice, simpleminded, but nice folks.
Many believe that the internet has made it easier for us to participate in political activism. But is that really true?
- Protesting in person is costly in terms of money and resources; some people have children to take care of, jobs that can't be away from, or may not have time to attend a planning event.
- The internet was supposed to be a way to sidestep this barrier to political activism. But this doesn't consider the other barriers preventing poor and working-class folks from participating in digital activism.
- In particular, these people lack ASETs: access to computers, the skills to use them, the empowerment necessary to feel that using Twitter or other social media is for them, and the time to make use of digital platforms in an effective way.
Some games are just for fun, others are for thought provoking statements on life, the universe, and everything.
- Video games are often dismissed as fun distractions, but some of them dive into deep issues.
- Through their interactive play elements, these games approach big issues intelligently and leave you both entertained and enlightened.
- These five games are certainly not the only games that cover these topics or do so well, but are a great starting point for somebody who wants to play something thought provoking.
The bid to buy Greenland is unlikely to become seriously considered.
- Greenland and Danish officials alike think the idea is ridiculous.
- The island is an autonomous state, and it's unlikely the Danish would sell it because of yearly subsidies costs.
- After hearing the Danish Prime Minister call the idea absurd, Trump cancelled their forthcoming meeting.