The Top 10 Posts on Neurobonkers in 2013
Simon Oxenham covers the best and the worst from the world of psychology and neuroscience. Formerly writing with the pseudonym "Neurobonkers", Simon has a history of debunking dodgy scientific research and tearing apart questionable science journalism in an irreverent style. Simon has written and blogged for publishers including: The Psychologist, Nature, Scientific American and The Guardian. His work has been praised in the New York Times and The Guardian and described in Pearson's Textbook of Psychology as "excoriating reviews of bad science/studies”.
Follow Simon on Twitter
Like Simon on Facebook
Follow Simon on Google+
Subscribe via Email
Subscribe via RSS
Contact Simon directly by Email
In this end of year roundup I present the top ten of my posts from the last year, selected by your mouse clicks, along with a "too long, didn't read" summary for each.
Taking irony to new levels, a paper was published in the journal Science titled “A human right to science”, too bad you can’t read it.
Tl;dr: Fellow neuroblogger "Neuropolarbear" coined “bp;dr” = behind paywall didn’t read (a bastardisation of tl;dr) to allow internet users to highlight articles they can’t access.
A look at the growing trend for regional blocks on internet content due to copyright beaurocracy and ways people are getting around them.
Tl;dr: Some of the best BBC blog content is blocked within the UK due to bureaucracy, in Germany as much as 61.5% of Youtube content was blocked due to legal quarrels over copyright. People are using proxies, TOR and VPN’s to get around regional restrictions.
If you take one of a very ride range of medicines, consuming grapefruit at the same time could cause you to have an adverse reaction.
Tl;dr: A growing list of drugs are metabolised by an enzyme called cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) that is inhibited by grapefruit.
A longitudinal study of over half a million tweets assessing 22 variables.
Tl;dr: Be interesting, be eloquent, interact.
A look at some bad writing habits pinched from Stanford University’s free online science writing course.
Tl;dr: Avoid the passive voice where possible, personal pronouns are good (I, we, etc), verbs should be used instead of nouns.
5. A borderline definite marginally mild notably numerically increasing suggestively verging on significant result
A tongue in cheek look at the ways researchers have cloaked the fact that a paper has not quite reached statistical significance.
Tl;dr: Tongue in cheek because the boundary between significant and not significance is somewhat of a fiction.
Alan Sokal (of the Sokal affair) returns with another spectacular attack on pseudoscience.
Tl;dr: A paper suggested a relationship between an individual's positive and negative emotions reaches a tipping point when it reaches a specific number which was tied to an equation that just happened to make a very pretty pattern... Sokal exposed the link to said equation to be a steaming pile of nonsense.
A look inside a paper published in the journal Qualitative Inquiry that is obscure to the extent that it is completely and utterly impenetrable.
Tl;dr: A demonstration that unwarranted complexity in communication can obscure science.
An in-depth look at a body of research that suggests calling someone intelligent can have counterintuitive results.
Tl;dr: Praising intelligence rather than effort reinforces the idea that intelligence is fixed and that those who are intelligent don’t get to where they are through hard work.
The hands-down, server-breaking, runaway train winner of this year was a post explaining the best and worst learning techniques based on the research evidence. I can now proudly say that the number one Google search query bringing new readers to my blog is "how to learn".
Tl;dr: Practice tests work, especially when you space that practice out. Techniques such as highlighting, summarising and rereading seem to be far less effective than many assume.
...So that's it for 2013, I hope you've learned something from this blog, I've certainly learned a lot from writing it, see you next year!
Image Credit: Shutterstock/MrGarry
Is everyone's favorite Thanksgiving centerpiece really to blame for the post-dinner doldrums?
- Americans kill around 45 million turkeys every year in preparation for the Thanksgiving meal, only to blame our favorite centerpiece for the following food comas.
- Rumor has it our after-dinner sleepiness results from the tryptophan found in turkey.
- However, it is the meal's overall nutritional imbalance, not just the tryptophan, that make us want to leave the dishes for tomorrow. Or maybe the next day.
Pfizer's partnerships strengthen their ability to deliver vaccines in developing countries.
- Community healthcare workers face many challenges in their work, including often traveling far distances to see their clients
- Pfizer is helping to drive the UN's sustainable development goals through partnerships.
- Pfizer partnered with AMP and the World Health Organization to develop a training program for healthcare workers.
Learn how to enter into the mindset of a successful inventor.
- Inventors come up with brilliant ideas through bucking trends and fostering creative mental spaces.
- Applied observation and deep thought is a necessity if you're going to invent something.
- Having an open mind to many ideas is a key starting point towards coming up with new ideas.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.