China’s Radical Plan to Gamify Social Control
How China's new social credit system could lead to an Orwellian future.
The Chinese government recently began trialing what is probably the largest social experiment of all time. The scheme known as China’s Social Credit System (SCS), links up credit data held by banks with data from social media, online purchases (Sesame Credit) and government data such as traffic violations. The resulting credit score can be used to reward citizens who are well behaved in the eyes of the state. The rewards could be anything from faster Internet speeds and a higher level of service from private companies to a lower level of bureaucracy when dealing with government agencies.
Last week the following video went viral after it described the dystopian possibilities enabled by the scheme, that is due to become mandatory for all Chinese citizens in 2020. “Mass censorship, jail time, assassinations — those are all big, messy implements for keeping a population in line. That messiness and severity fosters resentment, eventually rebellion. They are expensive, they are unwieldy; in the end those tools are impossible to maintain, but social pressure, ostracisation... those things are free; they happen on their own, and as a government tool, they don’t have nearly the same potential for going embarrassingly and disastrously wrong.” The filmmaker points out that techniques that take advantage of behavioural psychology will likely be far more effective than old-fashioned tools of oppression.
For their part, in a statement to New Scientist, Ant Financial the company that operates Sesame Credit has denied that material posted on social media would affect Sesame Credit scores. It remains unclear however whether the Chinese government is prepared to offer the same assurances for the broader social credit system. At this point, it seems quite reasonable to worry that there may be some substance behind the claims. Firstly, if social media posts and social media relationships aren’t factored into social credit scores, then the question must be raised as to how and why social data is being used in the first place. Secondly, the Chinese government has a terrible record for manipulating discussion on social media with a vast army of paid Internet commenters dubbed the “50-cent-party” who praise the government line while burying dissent. With growing evidence of the Chinese government’s efforts to control online discourse by stifling dissent, it seems reasonable to assume that the social credit system at the very least has huge potential for becoming an incredibly powerful device for social control.
Image Credit: XAUME OLLEROS / Stringer. A demonstrator offers a flower to riot policemen during a pro-democracy protest in Hong Kong on September 28, 2014. Police fired tear gas as tens of thousands of pro-democracy demonstrators brought parts of central Hong Kong to a standstill.
Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.
- The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
- Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
- Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
E-cigarettes may be safer than traditional cigarettes, but they come with their own risks.
- A new study used an MRI machine to examine how vaping e-cigarettes affects users' cardiovascular systems immediately after inhalation.
- The results showed that vaping causes impaired circulation, stiffer arteries and less oxygen in their blood.
- The new study adds to a growing body of research showing that e-cigarettes – while likely safer than traditional cigarettes – are far from harmless.
Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.
- Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
- In nature, properties of Particle B may be depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
- In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.