Random fact roundup: Hotels, feet, and The Simpsons

What do hotels, The Simpsons, and feet have in common? They're all in this actual blog post. Wow.

Hotels 

— The Ty Warner Penthouse suite is the most expensive hotel suite in New York, and costs $45,000 a night, or roughly what the average New Yorker makes in a year (source). But that's nothing compared to the most expensive hotel in the world, the Royal Penthouse Suite at the Hotel President Wilson, which costs $80,000 a night. What do you get for that money? 5,500 square feet, 12 bedrooms, bulletproof glass, a private gym, and free HBO on what the hotel says is the world's largest private TV screen. (source


— The Hans Brinker Hotel in Amsterdam bills itself as the "worst hotel in the world" and had an advertising campaign where they stuck tiny flags with their name on in pieces of dog poop around the city. It's actually a very nice place to stay, and has a full bar and nightclub. (source, source)

— One of the most interesting hotels in the world is actually a cruise ship converted into luxury homes that sails around the world. The ship is called The World, and you can get a 400 square foot apartment about it for $825,000. A 3br goes for about $7million USD. They sail all over the globe, but if you're looking for a young neighbor you'll be hard pressed: the average age of an apartment owner about the ship is about 65 years old. (source, source

Feet

— 80% of the world's population has a bigger left foot than their right. The size difference is usually under 1/3 of an inch. (source)

— The biggest feet in the world belong to a 20 year old Venezuelan man named Jeison Orlando Rodriguez Hernandez. He has size 26 feet (in American shoe sizing). His right foot is 1ft 3.79 inches long, while his left is 1ft 3.59 inches long. (source

— Director Quentin Tarantino is public about his sexual fetish for feet. 5 out of his 8 movies show women's bare feet for about 1.5% of the film each... the other 3 (Reservoir Dogs, Django Unchained, and The Hateful Eight) don't feature (ha!) feet at all. If you were to cut all the bare feet scenes in his movies together, you would have a cinematic 10 minutes and 24 seconds of bare women's feet. (source

The Simpsons

— As of today (May 14th, 2018) if you played every Simpsons episode back-to-back without commercial breaks it would take 9 days, 18 hours, and 8 minutes. (source)

— Homer has had 188 jobs throughout the course of the show, including his nuclear powerplant job. (source

— Elizabeth Taylor voiced Maggie Simpson's one and only line of dialogue (so far)... "Daddy!", in episode 69 in season 4 of the show (source, and watch it here). There's also a hidden movie-within-the show: the McBain movie, which is seen in fits and starts throughout several seasons and episodes, can be seen here

— FOX owns the rights for The Simpsons until 2082. Simpsons-branded merchandise rakes in $750,000,000 a year. (source

— Showrunner Al Jean wants to end the series with the family arriving at a Christmas pageant, which is how the first episode began. Therefore, the show would be a continuous loop. (source

Big Think
Sponsored by Lumina Foundation

Upvote/downvote each of the videos below!

As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in.

Keep reading Show less

Scientists discover how to trap mysterious dark matter

A new method promises to capture an elusive dark world particle.

Surprising Science
  • Scientists working on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) devised a method for trapping dark matter particles.
  • Dark matter is estimated to take up 26.8% of all matter in the Universe.
  • The researchers will be able to try their approach in 2021, when the LHC goes back online.
Keep reading Show less

Yale scientists restore brain function to 32 clinically dead pigs

Researchers hope the technology will further our understanding of the brain, but lawmakers may not be ready for the ethical challenges.

Still from John Stephenson's 1999 rendition of Animal Farm.
Surprising Science
  • Researchers at the Yale School of Medicine successfully restored some functions to pig brains that had been dead for hours.
  • They hope the technology will advance our understanding of the brain, potentially developing new treatments for debilitating diseases and disorders.
  • The research raises many ethical questions and puts to the test our current understanding of death.

The image of an undead brain coming back to live again is the stuff of science fiction. Not just any science fiction, specifically B-grade sci fi. What instantly springs to mind is the black-and-white horrors of films like Fiend Without a Face. Bad acting. Plastic monstrosities. Visible strings. And a spinal cord that, for some reason, is also a tentacle?

But like any good science fiction, it's only a matter of time before some manner of it seeps into our reality. This week's Nature published the findings of researchers who managed to restore function to pigs' brains that were clinically dead. At least, what we once thought of as dead.

What's dead may never die, it seems

The researchers did not hail from House Greyjoy — "What is dead may never die" — but came largely from the Yale School of Medicine. They connected 32 pig brains to a system called BrainEx. BrainEx is an artificial perfusion system — that is, a system that takes over the functions normally regulated by the organ. The pigs had been killed four hours earlier at a U.S. Department of Agriculture slaughterhouse; their brains completely removed from the skulls.

BrainEx pumped an experiment solution into the brain that essentially mimic blood flow. It brought oxygen and nutrients to the tissues, giving brain cells the resources to begin many normal functions. The cells began consuming and metabolizing sugars. The brains' immune systems kicked in. Neuron samples could carry an electrical signal. Some brain cells even responded to drugs.

The researchers have managed to keep some brains alive for up to 36 hours, and currently do not know if BrainEx can have sustained the brains longer. "It is conceivable we are just preventing the inevitable, and the brain won't be able to recover," said Nenad Sestan, Yale neuroscientist and the lead researcher.

As a control, other brains received either a fake solution or no solution at all. None revived brain activity and deteriorated as normal.

The researchers hope the technology can enhance our ability to study the brain and its cellular functions. One of the main avenues of such studies would be brain disorders and diseases. This could point the way to developing new of treatments for the likes of brain injuries, Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and neurodegenerative conditions.

"This is an extraordinary and very promising breakthrough for neuroscience. It immediately offers a much better model for studying the human brain, which is extraordinarily important, given the vast amount of human suffering from diseases of the mind [and] brain," Nita Farahany, the bioethicists at the Duke University School of Law who wrote the study's commentary, told National Geographic.

An ethical gray matter

Before anyone gets an Island of Dr. Moreau vibe, it's worth noting that the brains did not approach neural activity anywhere near consciousness.

The BrainEx solution contained chemicals that prevented neurons from firing. To be extra cautious, the researchers also monitored the brains for any such activity and were prepared to administer an anesthetic should they have seen signs of consciousness.

Even so, the research signals a massive debate to come regarding medical ethics and our definition of death.

Most countries define death, clinically speaking, as the irreversible loss of brain or circulatory function. This definition was already at odds with some folk- and value-centric understandings, but where do we go if it becomes possible to reverse clinical death with artificial perfusion?

"This is wild," Jonathan Moreno, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania, told the New York Times. "If ever there was an issue that merited big public deliberation on the ethics of science and medicine, this is one."

One possible consequence involves organ donations. Some European countries require emergency responders to use a process that preserves organs when they cannot resuscitate a person. They continue to pump blood throughout the body, but use a "thoracic aortic occlusion balloon" to prevent that blood from reaching the brain.

The system is already controversial because it raises concerns about what caused the patient's death. But what happens when brain death becomes readily reversible? Stuart Younger, a bioethicist at Case Western Reserve University, told Nature that if BrainEx were to become widely available, it could shrink the pool of eligible donors.

"There's a potential conflict here between the interests of potential donors — who might not even be donors — and people who are waiting for organs," he said.

It will be a while before such experiments go anywhere near human subjects. A more immediate ethical question relates to how such experiments harm animal subjects.

Ethical review boards evaluate research protocols and can reject any that causes undue pain, suffering, or distress. Since dead animals feel no pain, suffer no trauma, they are typically approved as subjects. But how do such boards make a judgement regarding the suffering of a "cellularly active" brain? The distress of a partially alive brain?

The dilemma is unprecedented.

Setting new boundaries

Another science fiction story that comes to mind when discussing this story is, of course, Frankenstein. As Farahany told National Geographic: "It is definitely has [sic] a good science-fiction element to it, and it is restoring cellular function where we previously thought impossible. But to have Frankenstein, you need some degree of consciousness, some 'there' there. [The researchers] did not recover any form of consciousness in this study, and it is still unclear if we ever could. But we are one step closer to that possibility."

She's right. The researchers undertook their research for the betterment of humanity, and we may one day reap some unimaginable medical benefits from it. The ethical questions, however, remain as unsettling as the stories they remind us of.

Videos
  • As a stand-up comedian, Pete Holmes knows how words can manipulate audiences — for good and bad.
  • Words aren't just words. They stich together our social fabric, helping establish and maintain relationships.
  • Holmes has a clever linguistic exercise meant to bring you closer to the people around you.