ISTE 2010 conference keynote: The gloves are off!

Interesting conversations are occurring, well-known edubloggers are advocating for their topic suggestions (see, e.g., Vicki Davis and Brian Crosby), and, perhaps most importantly for ISTE, there seems to be a fair amount of interest in its 'choose your conference keynote' project.

After just a few days, my suggestion is duking it out with Kevin Honeycutt's for the top position:

I think Kevin is a great guy, but I don't think his topic should be a keynote over mine. It seems to me that 95%+ of the ISTE conference every year is the same thing: tools, teachers, and classrooms. These are important, but as I said in one of my comments under my topic suggestion:

We've been relying on teachers & teacher leaders & tech integrationists & tech coordinators for decades now. Where's it gotten us in terms of systemic reform? It's gotten us isolated pockets of excellence in a few classrooms. When a principal "gets it," nearly the entire school changes (minus the few resisters). When a superintendent "gets it," nearly the entire district changes (minus the few resisters).

I'll repeat... It is the formal leaders (administrators, policymakers), not informal leaders, that have control over ALL of the important variables: money; time; personnel hiring, evaluation, and assignment; organizational vision and direction; professional development; etc. All you have to do is look at a school like the Science Leadership Academy to understand the importance and power of a formal leader that "gets it."

Why such pushback on a leadership keynote? It's not like we have one every year. In fact, we'd be hard pressed to remember more than a small few in the history of NECC/ISTE. ISTE has five keynotes and I'm a big fan of Kevin Honeycutt. But one of the keynotes should pertain to effective FORMAL leadership. Otherwise we'll just keep talking about tools and teachers like we always do...

So the gloves are off, Kevin! I don't know if I can pull this off, but I'm not going down without a fight.

Thanks to everyone who already has voted for my topic and/or participated in the conversation. Any assistance that you can continue to lend me would be most appreciated; I need more people to vote for my suggestion and to spread the word about the contest. I've got an uphill battle and am going to need all of the help I can get!

Related posts

  • Please vote for my ISTE 2010 conference keynote suggestion
  • Related tweets

    • Please RT!
    • Right now leadership is losing to TOOLS yet again. Ugh.
    • NASA astronomer Michelle Thaller on ​the multiple dimensions of space and human sexuality

      Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.

      Think Again Podcasts
      • Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
      • What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
      • Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
      Keep reading Show less

      How to split the USA into two countries: Red and Blue

      Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.

      Image: Dicken Schrader
      Strange Maps
      • America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
      • Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
      • Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
      Keep reading Show less

      Ideology drives us apart. Neuroscience can bring us back together.

      A guide to making difficult conversations possible—and peaceful—in an increasingly polarized nation.

      • How can we reach out to people on the other side of the divide? Get to know the other person as a human being before you get to know them as a set of tribal political beliefs, says Sarah Ruger. Don't launch straight into the difficult topics—connect on a more basic level first.
      • To bond, use icebreakers backed by neuroscience and psychology: Share a meal, watch some comedy, see awe-inspiring art, go on a tough hike together—sharing tribulation helps break down some of the mental barriers we have between us. Then, get down to talking, putting your humanity before your ideology.
      • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit