Is Will asking the right questions?

Will

Richardson voiced his frustration in a recent post


about the trouble that

he's having getting teachers to focus on the potential of Web 2.0 tools to

enhance their own personal learning.

Part of me wonders if he's asking the right questions. It's hard to tell what

Will is saying to the teachers. If he's trying to get at their own personal

learning practices, it seems to me that the first questions may need to be

  • What are your personal and professional

interests?

  • What are you passionate about? What do you care about?
  • How do you currently learn and grow in those
  • areas?

    All teachers are learners because all humans are learners (okay, 99.99% of

    humans are learners; we all know a few oddballs). If Will can find out how these

    educators acquire and gain new knowledge that is of personal and/or professional

    interest to them (particularly outside of school for their hobbies, music,

    athletics, and other outside interests), it seems to me there then exists a

    natural opening to discuss how various Web 2.0 tools can connect these folks to

    various communities and content of interest.

    Will, perhaps you're doing all this already. For example, maybe you're

    contextually embedding your participants' learning by selecting one or more

    individuals, asking them what their interests are and how they learn and grow in

    those areas, and then illustrating in front of the rest of the audience how to

    expand those circles of knowledge and knowing using these new tools (look, here

    are 56 blogs about

    pomeranians

    ! 204 blogs

    about orchids

    ! a wiki

    devoted to knitting

    !).

    I don't know what your strategies have been, Will; this is just what I'd do. But

    I'd love to learn more (hint, hint)!

    Big Think Edge
    • The meaning of the word 'confidence' seems obvious. But it's not the same as self-esteem.
    • Confidence isn't just a feeling on your inside. It comes from taking action in the world.
    • Join Big Think Edge today and learn how to achieve more confidence when and where it really matters.
    Sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies
    • There are 2 different approaches to governing free speech on college campuses.
    • One is a morality/order approach. The other is a bottom-up approach.
    • Emily Chamlee-Wright says there are many benefits to having no one central authority on what is appropriate speech.

    Why the number 137 is one of the greatest mysteries in physics

    Famous physicists like Richard Feynman think 137 holds the answers to the Universe.

    Pixabay
    Surprising Science
    • The fine structure constant has mystified scientists since the 1800s.
    • The number 1/137 might hold the clues to the Grand Unified Theory.
    • Relativity, electromagnetism and quantum mechanics are unified by the number.
    Keep reading Show less
    Big Think Edge
    • Economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett breaks down what qualities will inspire others to believe in you.
    • Here's how 300 leaders and 4,000 mid-level managers described someone with executive presence.
    • Get more deep insights like these to power your career forward. Join Big Think Edge.