You Say You Are a Libertarian, But Do You Know What That Means?

Reason magazine conducted a poll which showed that Obama won a majority of self-identified Libertarians. Let’s assume that’s true. 

 

I’m Libertarian, but one of the problems with being a Libertarian is that the word is used by so many people to mean so many different things that it’s really hard to tell what you’re getting when you have someone say to you, “I’m a Libertarian.”  For example, I understand that Reason magazine, a Libertarian magazine, conducted a poll which showed that Obama won a majority of self-identified Libertarians.  


Let’s assume that’s true.  What does that say?  It says first you’ve got a lot of people who call themselves Libertarians who are defining that primarily in terms of social issues such as gay marriage and legalization of drugs and other kinds of things, whereby Obama would be a much more attractive candidate to them then a conservative Republican.  

On the other hand, sort of the central tenet of Libertarianism is that each person owns his own body and that the State has a very limited right to tell us what we should do as long as we aren’t harming someone else.  Well, that means if you’re making an honest living and not bothering anybody else, the government really doesn’t have any right to regulate what you do economically as well as in your social behavior.  

And I think that probably what we have in polls that show most Libertarians voting for Obama are people who don’t understand when real Libertarians talk about freedom, they’re talking about the whole package.  And the whole package very definitely includes the freedom to engage in mutually agreeable economic transactions with fellow human beings without the government getting involved.

In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

Algorithmic catastrophe: How news feeds reprogram your mind and habits

The most powerful editors in the world? Algorithms.

Sponsored by Charles Koch Foundation
  • According to a Pew Research poll, 45% of U.S. adults get at least some of their news from Facebook, with half of that amount using Facebook as their only news outlet.
  • Algorithms on social media pick what people read. There's worry that social media algorithms are creating filter bubbles, so that they never have to read something they don't agree with and thus cause tribal thinking and confirmation bias.
  • The Charles Koch Foundation is committed to understanding what drives intolerance and the best ways to cure it. The foundation supports interdisciplinary research to overcome intolerance, new models for peaceful interactions, and experiments that can heal fractured communities. For more information, visit charleskochfoundation.org/courageous-collaborations.
  • The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Keep reading Show less

Psychological gym experiment proves the power of mind over matter

It isn't mind over matter as much as mind properly working with matter.

DENVER, CO - MAY 16: Brian and Monica Folts workout on treadmills at Colorado Athletic Club Tabor Center on May 16, 2018 in Denver, Colorado. The couple runs marathons and compete in Ironman triathlons and train on on treadmills. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post via Getty Images)
Mind & Brain
  • A new Stanford study finds believing you have genetic predispositions for obesity and low exercise endurance changes your physiology.
  • Participants told they had a protective obesity gene had a better response than those told they did not, even if they did not actually have the gene.
  • Runners performed poorly after learning they did not have the gene for endurance, even if they actually have the gene.
Keep reading Show less

Why this 2015 NASA study is beloved by climate change skeptics

The findings of the controversial study flew in the face of past research on ice gains in Antarctica.

NASA
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A 2015 NASA study caused major controversy by claiming that Antarctica was gaining more ice than it was losing.
  • The study said that ice gains in East Antarctica were effectively canceling out ice losses in the western region of the continent.
  • Since 2015, multiple studies have shown that Antarctica is losing more ice than it's gaining, though the 2015 study remains a favorite of climate change doubters to this day.
Keep reading Show less