Why We Blame Teachers
There's a kind of hostility to teachers that underlines the current corporate reform narrative.
I think that teachers are under fire today because, as a friend put it to me, it’s folk wisdom that teachers are uniquely responsible for what happens to children. But, actually, it’s not folk wisdom.
There is a kind of a wiser understanding of how children grow and develop and learn that recognizes that children’s first educator is their family and that nurturance really matters. And on the first day of school there is already an achievement gap between the children of the wealthy and children of the poor and it’s also correlated with children from different ethnic backgrounds, where poverty and affluence matter a great deal as well.
So teachers have an immense impact within the school, within the classroom, but their impact is dwarfed as compared to the influence of the family. So I think that it’s easy for today’s corporate reform movement to say teachers are uniquely responsible, but that goes against everything that we know, both from neuroscience and from social science. Children's brains and children’s attitudes are formed in the first five years of life and children’s opportunity to learn is affected by the homes in which they grow, the communities in which they grow, their respect for learning, their respect for teachers.
So, on the one hand, the corporate reform movement will say teacher quality is all that matters. We care so much about teacher quality. On the other hand, millions of teachers are demoralized by their line about if the scores are low, it’s your fault. Nothing else matters. The family doesn't matter. Poverty doesn't matter. The social conditions don't matter. Only you matter. And what this does is to make teachers responsible for things beyond their control. They should certainly be responsible for what is within their control.
We have to acknowledge that the family matters. The community matters. The respect for education of the community matters. All those things are important and teachers play a very important role but they are not uniquely responsible for the success or failure of children.
The other important part about this particular narrative is to recognize that teachers work in a community and that the current way of looking at things is to say we’re going to look at the students’ test scores and hold teacher A responsible for those students and teacher B responsible for those students. Teachers don't like this at all, because they understand that teachers A, B, all the way through Z are working together and that the reading scores are affected not just by what happens in the reading class, not just what happens at home, which is a mighty influence, but by what happens in the social studies class, by what happens throughout the school. So they work as a team. They work collaboratively. They don't want to be put into competition with one another and they want to be recognized as a team.
If you’ll think about reading, what matters most is whether children are read to by their parents, that's A-1. And children who are never read to by their parents don't start school on a level playing field. So there's a kind of hostility to teachers that underlines the current corporate reform narrative.
In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
Former president of the ACLU Nadine Strossen discusses whether our society should always defend free speech rights, even for groups who would oppose such rights.
- Former ACLU president Nadine Strossen understands that protecting free speech rights isn't always a straightforward proposition.
- In this video, Strossen describes the reasoning behind why the ACLU defended the free speech rights of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, 1977.
- The opinions expressed in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of the Charles Koch Foundation, which encourages the expression of diverse viewpoints within a culture of civil discourse and mutual respect.
Want to be smarter than you were yesterday? Learn to have better conversations using these 3 design principles.
- What is a great conversation? They are the ones that leave us feeling smarter or more curious, with a sense that we have discovered something, understood something about another person, or have been challenged.
- There are 3 design principles that lead to great conversations: humility, critical thinking, and sympathetic listening.
- Critical thinking is the celebrated cornerstone of liberalism, but next time you're in a challenging and rewarding conversation, try to engage sympathetic listening too. Understanding why another intelligent person holds ideas that are at odds with your own is often more enlightening than merely hunting for logic errors.
A consortium of scientists and engineers have proposed that the U.S. and Mexico build a series of guarded solar, wind, natural gas and desalination facilities along the entirety of the border.
- The proposal was recently presented to several U.S. members of Congress.
- The plan still calls for border security, considering all of the facilities along the border would be guarded and connected by physical barriers.
- It's undoubtedly an expensive and complicated proposal, but the team argues that border regions are ideal spots for wind and solar energy, and that they could use the jobs and fresh water the energy park would create.
The reason one diet does not suit all may be found in our guts.