What All Crises Have in Common
Crises are fundamentally psychological phenomena, they’re not driven by rational decision-making necessarily, they are driven by fear and somewhat driven by greed.
Bob Bruner is the eighth dean of the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia. He teaches and conducts research in finance and management. Before his appointment as dean in August 2005, Bruner served as the founding executive director of Darden's Batten Institute, which focuses on entrepreneurship and innovation. There, he expanded Darden's Business Incubator.
As a financial economist, Bruner is best known for his research on mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance and financial panics. His books include "Deals from Hell," "Applied Mergers and Acquisitions" and "The Panic of 1907: Lessons Learned from the Market's Perfect Storm," with Sean D. Carr, which attracted wide attention for its discussion of the underpinnings of financial crises.
The panic of 1907 can tell us a lot about the crisis of 2007 to 2009, the so-called sub prime crisis. Crises have in common a number of attributes. The first is, they are fundamentally psychological phenomena, they’re not driven by rational decision-making necessarily, they are driven by fear and somewhat driven by greed. This is a lesson that is perhaps underplayed in the way schools and pundits talk about the financial markets. But the truth is, they are extremely potent forces in the world of business, these psychological forces.
What is it that drives them? Shawn Carr and I describe in our book, The Panic of 1907, a fundamental factor driving such panics is information asymmetries. Some people know things that other people don’t. All panics take their route in the fact that information is not well-distributed. Most panics are founded in the wake of extraordinary booms. Booms tend to create more complex institutions, tend to draw naïve and less sophisticated players into the markets, tend to create wild expectations about the future, all of which color the information people have the way they process it.
And then a jarring event occurs. Typically it’s a failed speculation that brings down a financial institution and this makes people sit up and say, “Gee, I really didn’t know much about that institution. And if I didn’t know that institution, maybe I should be worried about the rest of them.” And hence a run on a bank begins - on many banks. So we discover that information is just a fundamentally important phenomenon.
So I have argued to public policy experts and legislators that transparency is one of the most important antidotes to a crisis. And frankly, it’s an antidote to help – to preempt a crisis. If we can simply help the world see what is the health and wellbeing of financial institutions, if we can be assured that the institutions have plenty of capital, the safety buffer with which to absorb unexpected shocks to the system, all of these things would go a long way toward addressing the likelihood of another crisis.
It is almost inevitable that there will be more financial crises. We have not had a century without them and truly one of the deep lessons of 1907 and indeed the sub prime crisis is that fundamentally we ought to retain enough walking around money and rainy day money in our bank accounts of households and businesses and governments so that we too can withstand the unanticipated shocks.
In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.