We Don't "Know It All." But Here's What's Worth Celebrating

In cosmology we are at a similar place to where Darwin was in biology.  

We Don't "Know It All." But Here's What's Worth Celebrating

I've tried to write about the remarkable discoveries in science over the last 40 years because I think that's really what motivated me.  I want to communicate these amazing revelations about the universe.  And it is true that I argued that they suggest the universe could come from nothing without any supernatural shenanigans. That God becomes even more redundant and irrelevant than she was before. 


I think the point is that people sometimes misunderstand the claim that we know it all.  We don’t.  We don’t have laws of physics that take us back to equal zero. All we can do is argue based on the plausibility of what we know.  And what is amazing is if you asked "What are the characteristics that a universe would have if it were created from nothing by simple laws of nature" -- our universe has precisely those properties.  And it didn’t have to be that way.

Does that mean we can assert with certainty that the universe came for nothing just by natural phenomena?  No, but it’s plausible.  And that’s worth celebrating.  To me, it’s identical to the situation that we found ourselves a few hundred years ago with Darwin.  Before Darwin, life was a miracle.  There was special creation for every life form on Earth to live in the environment in which it lives.  But what Darwin showed is by simple assumptions, genetic variation in a population and natural selection, you could plausibly explain the evidence for all the diversity of life on Earth.  And in fact, that idea agreed with the data.

He didn’t know about DNA or the details of replication.  He didn’t have the detail theory, but it was plausible.  And that changed our picture, our understanding of biology, and our own origins. And what, to me, is wonderful, is that somehow in cosmology we are at a similar place.  We don’t have all the answers but we are beginning to be able to address these questions of our origins in a cosmic sense that I never would have imagined 25 years ago we could address.  And that is worth celebrating.  And that’s what I've tried to celebrate in my writing.

In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio. 

Is the universe a graveyard? This theory suggests humanity may be alone.

Ever since we've had the technology, we've looked to the stars in search of alien life. It's assumed that we're looking because we want to find other life in the universe, but what if we're looking to make sure there isn't any?

According to the Great Filter theory, Earth might be one of the only planets with intelligent life. And that's a good thing (NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team [STScI/AURA]).
Surprising Science

Here's an equation, and a rather distressing one at that: N = R* × fP × ne × f1 × fi × fc × L. It's the Drake equation, and it describes the number of alien civilizations in our galaxy with whom we might be able to communicate. Its terms correspond to values such as the fraction of stars with planets, the fraction of planets on which life could emerge, the fraction of planets that can support intelligent life, and so on. Using conservative estimates, the minimum result of this equation is 20. There ought to be 20 intelligent alien civilizations in the Milky Way that we can contact and who can contact us. But there aren't any.

Keep reading Show less

Beyond the two cultures: rethinking science and the humanities

Cross-disciplinary cooperation is needed to save civilization.

Credit: Public domain
13-8
  • There is a great disconnect between the sciences and the humanities.
  • Solutions to most of our real-world problems need both ways of knowing.
  • Moving beyond the two-culture divide is an essential step to ensure our project of civilization.
Keep reading Show less

Stephen Hawking's black hole theory proved right

New study analyzes gravitational waves to confirm the late Stephen Hawking's black hole area theorem.

Model of spiraling black holes that are merging with each other.

Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
Surprising Science
  • A new paper confirms Stephen Hawking's black hole area theorem.
  • The researchers used gravitational wave data to prove the theorem.
  • The data came from Caltech and MIT's Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory.
Keep reading Show less
Quantcast